Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Increase of Clusterin Protein Could Protect from Alzheimer’s Disease

In a new study published in Neuron titled “CLU alleviates Alzheimer’s disease-relevant processes by modulating astrocyte reactivity and microglia-dependent synaptic density,” researchers from Mass General Brigham have identified a potential strategy to protect

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

In a new study published in Neuron titled “CLU alleviates Alzheimer’s disease-relevant processes by modulating astrocyte reactivity and microglia-dependent synaptic density,” researchers from Mass General Brigham have identified a potential strategy to protect against Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by increasing the clusterin (CLU) protein, a molecular chaperone that binds misfolded proteins.

Their results uncover the mechanism of how increased CLU protects the brain from amyloid plaques and loss of synapses, while also identifying which individuals are most likely to respond based on their genetics.

“Increasing clusterin has the potential to prevent cognitive decline in a way that is different than and complementary to anti-amyloid therapies to promote brain resilience,” said Tracy Young-Pearse, PhD, the vice chair of neuroscience research at Brigham and corresponding author of the study. “Clusterin may also be beneficial for other brain diseases of aging, given the mechanism we uncovered in our study.”

CLU facilitates the clearance of misfolded proteins through receptor-mediated endocytosis. In Alzheimer’s, CLU localizes to amyloid plaques and modulates removal, supporting a neuroprotective role.

While prior studies have advanced understanding of CLU biology, they have largely relied on mouse models or investigated CLU’s role outside the brain. Employing physiologically relevant systems in which CLU is expressed in human cells is important for determining the role of CLU in Alzheimer’s risk.

To elucidate CLU’s mechanistic role in Alzheimer’s, the researchers leveraged several different models, including human brain cell models, animal models, and brain tissue from over 700 participants of the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Projects, a longitudinal, epidemiologic clinical-pathological study of memory, motor, and functional problems in individuals aged 65 years and older from across the United States. Results from multi-omic, post-mortem studies of human brain tissue showed that CLU expression is higher in AD brain tissue.

The authors found that reduction of CLU produced from astrocytes, glial cells in the brain and spinal cord, caused microglia, immune cells of the central nervous system, to modulate extracellular apolipoprotein E (APOE) and phosphorylated tau, two proteins associated with neurodegenerative disease. The study also demonstrated that CLU Alzheimer’s-risk alleles are associated with reduced CLU protein and heightened inflammatory profiles.

“As amyloid accumulates in the brain, some individuals can mount a protective response by efficiently upregulating CLU, which helps preserve synapses and prevent cognitive decline. In others, this response is impaired, leading to insufficient CLU production, heightened inflammation, and progression toward Alzheimer’s disease,” said Young-Pearse.

Taken together, the results establish a mechanistic link between Alzheimer’s genetic risk factors, astrocyte reactivity, and microglia-mediated effects on synaptic integrity to produce the protective effect caused by CLU upregulation.

The findings of CLU’s neuroprotective effects have important implications for the design and testing of new complementary therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, increasing CLU may be beneficial for treating other age-related brain diseases, many of which share similar mechanisms of neuroinflammatory dysregulation.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →