Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Immune reset: How T cell engagers can change the autoimmune treatment landscape

Living with an autoimmune disease often means navigating a lifelong, complex condition. A recent study estimates that autoimmune diseases affect 400 to 600 million people worldwide, with the burden continuing to grow. The treatment paradigm for these millions

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Living with an autoimmune disease often means navigating a lifelong, complex condition. A recent study estimates that autoimmune diseases affect 400 to 600 million people worldwide, with the burden continuing to grow. The treatment paradigm for these millions often centers on symptom management, mainly through medications that broadly suppress the immune system. Yet even then, sustained remission isn't always achievable. As a researcher and physician, I am encouraged that the field is experiencing a shift toward precision immunology, driven by breakthroughs in our understanding that dysregulated B cells and plasma cells play central roles in driving autoimmune pathophysiology. This insight has opened the door to what we call ‘immune reset’: eliminating disease-driving immune cells so the immune system can rebuild and restore tolerance. Instead of long-term suppression, the goal is durable remission.

T Cell Engagers: Designing the Path to Immune Reset

In the U.S. alone, autoimmune diseases impose over $100 billion in direct annual costs on our healthcare system, underscoring why transformative approaches are urgently needed. Emerging scientific data suggests that T cell engagers represent a promising class of biologics that may enable a long-lasting disease-modifying response through an ‘immune reset’. T cell engagers act like a molecular matchmaker, bringing T cells into direct contact with autoreactive B cells so they can be efficiently eliminated. T cell engagers build on lessons from earlier approaches such as anti-CD20 antibodies but aim to go further by more deeply and broadly eliminating B cells and antibody-producing plasma cells. While CAR T therapies established what’s possible with a logistically complex modality, T cell engagers may offer a more scalable, accessible way to redirect T cells to ‘reset’ the immune system in autoimmune diseases. This is fundamentally different from current approaches: rather than simply easing symptoms, T cell engagers have the potential to address the root cause of disease. From a clinical perspective, T cell engagers could offer patients a more manageable treatment experience. Subcutaneous administration offers dosing and retreatment options that may reduce patient time in healthcare settings and allow greater flexibility in care. Equally important, T cell engagers can be manufactured at scale and provided in an off-the-shelf format, which could broaden patient accessibility while reducing the burden on providers and healthcare systems.

Targeting Multiple Pathways for Broader Impact

B cells and plasma cells from across the maturation continuum may play a different role in the pathophysiology of specific autoimmune diseases and may therefore require treatments that target different populations of cells to most effectively address the abnormal immune system response. Multiple promising targets have been identified, each potentially central to modifying different autoimmune diseases. This diversity of targets represents a significant opportunity for the field. At Cullinan Therapeutics, our investigation of two distinct T cell engager programs reflects an intentional approach to this opportunity. Each program targets B cells at different stages of the cellular maturation process, allowing us to address different diseases and potentially reach more people across a broader range of autoimmune conditions than either molecule could address alone. CD19, a protein expressed throughout the B cell lineage, provides an opportunity for broad B cell depletion. Our investigational CD19-directed bispecific T cell engager, CLN-978, is designed to deeply deplete autoreactive B cells, and is currently being studied in systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and Sjögren’s disease in active clinical trials across multiple countries. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is highly expressed on long-lived plasma cells that can drive persistent autoimmune activity. Our investigational BCMA-targeted bispecific T cell engager, velinotamig, licensed from Genrix Bio, builds on early efficacy data in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and is planned for study in autoimmune diseases driven by self-reactive long-lived plasma cells. Progressing these separate programs exemplifies how the industry can address the full spectrum of autoimmune pathology, developing treatments that better match the complexity of autoimmune disease biology.

Patient Needs Shaping the Next Wave of Innovation

It’s clear that the millions of people living with autoimmune diseases need more than incremental progress. I believe T cell engagers represent the next wave of innovation to deliver on that need. The possibility of sustained remission without long-term immunosuppression represents a paradigm shift that could dramatically improve quality of life while reducing long-term system burden. But progress must extend beyond clinical outcomes. My colleagues at Cullinan Therapeutics remain focused on how patients experience their treatment, from early development through clinical trials and beyond. From convenience to accessibility, our goal is to create a future where patients spend less time managing their conditions and more time on what matters most. If successful, these advances won’t just mean new medicines — they could redefine autoimmune care by providing long-lasting remission and giving patient s the opportunity to live without the constant burden of disease .

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →