Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Fulcrum exploring a potential sale after FDA sidelined its sickle cell drug

Fulcrum Therapeutics has begun a strategic review that may result in it getting sold, a move made after the company’s main medicine hit a possibly insurmountable obstacle. On Tuesday, Fulcrum disclosed that, late last month, it received the official record fro

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Fulcrum Therapeutics has begun a strategic review that may result in it getting sold, a move made after the company’s main medicine hit a possibly insurmountable obstacle. On Tuesday, Fulcrum disclosed that, late last month, it received the official record from a recent meeting with the Food and Drug Administration. The meeting revolved around next steps for pociredir, an experimental treatment for sickle cell disease that Fulcrum had ushered through early-stage human testing. According to the company, FDA staff were worried about pociredir’s safety, given emerging data that showed higher-than-expected rates of “secondary” blood cancers in patients who had received an Ipsen drug, Tazverik, which was pulled from the market in March. Fulcrum’s drug works in a similar-but-different way, and the company tried to make the case that these differences are important to assessing overall benefits and risks. The FDA, though, still concluded the potential hazards were too great and “left no viable regulatory path forward.” Fulcrum has therefore made the “very difficult decision to discontinue development of pociredir,” said CEO Alex Sapir. The company is now exploring strategic alternatives, including potentially merging or selling either assets or the entire business. It’s also started efforts to “significantly reduce” operating expenses and preserve capital, though specific details weren’t provided. Fulcrum had a third of a billion dollars in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of March 31. Fulcrum’s stock price, which had already fallen significantly since late last year, cratered following Tuesday’s update. Shares were down more than 50%, to just above $3 apiece. “With limited visibility into future value creation beyond strategic alternatives and cost-cutting initiatives, we are moving to the sidelines,” wrote Leerink Partners analyst Joseph Schwartz, who also downgraded his rating on Fulcrum’s stock to “Market Perform.” Schwartz noted, however, that his team was “surprised by this outcome” due to the effects pociredir demonstrated in that early-stage study. There, the drug boosted fetal hemoglobin levels — one of the most proven methods for treating sickle cell — and improved red blood cell health in adults with severe disease. Schwartz highlighted how the trial also hadn’t reported any new clinical safety signals. Pociredir is designed to inhibit a large protein complex, “PRC2,” that helps turn off fetal hemoglobin production. It does this by latching onto a specific piece of the protein that, notably, is distinct from where Tazverik binds. Recent clinical data pointing to an increased incidence of hematologic malignancies among patients given Tazverik appears to have led the FDA to draw a “hard line regarding the risk/benefit profile of all PRC2 inhibitors regardless of mechanistic differences,” Schwartz wrote. The FDA previously put a so-called full clinical hold on Fulcrum’s program in early 2023, in part because of concerns with the wider class of PRC2-targeting drugs. The hold was lifted that summer, with Fulcrum agreeing to tailor the type of patients who were eligible to participate in its Phase 1 study. Schwartz argues the FDA position regarding pociredir “seems to have been biased” by malignancy observations seen in preclinical testing. Luca Issi, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, claims his team wasn’t entirely surprised by this outcome. While it’s “unfortunate for the many [sickle cell] patients looking for therapeutic alternatives, we do believe that discontinuing the program is the right pragmatic decision given the FDA clearly believes that this is a class effect,” Issi wrote in his own note to clients. Fulcrum’s is the latest in a string of setbacks for sickle cell drugmakers. In 2023, development was discontinued for three experimental treatments from Intellia Therapeutics, Sangamo Therapeutics and Graphite Bio. Two years later, Pfizer and Agios Pharmaceuticals each delivered disappointing clinical results. Pfizer’s study was for a drug that the pharmaceutical giant picked up through the $5.4 billion acquisition of Global Blood Therapeutics. In 2024, Pfizer removed from the market another asset from that deal, the approved sickle cell therapy Oxbryta, because of safety concerns . The year prior, Novartis withdrew Adakveo from the European market after authorities there formally revoked the sickle cell disease drug’s authorization. The World Health Organization estimates that, as of 2021, close to 8 million people had sickle cell. The disease causes "vaso-occlusive crises," a sudden, brutal wave of pain brought on by the crescent-shaped blood cells block small blood vessels. It can also make patients more vulnerable to infections and trigger chronic damage. Often, the life expectancy for people with sickle is 20 or so years less than their peers.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
05What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →