Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

FDA reverses course on Moderna’s flu vaccine

The Food and Drug Administration has reversed its prior decision and will review Moderna’s experimental flu vaccine application for potential approval under a revised regulatory approach. Last week, the FDA rejected the company’s application, citing issues wit

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

The Food and Drug Administration has reversed its prior decision and will review Moderna’s experimental flu vaccine application for potential approval under a revised regulatory approach. Last week, the FDA rejected the company’s application, citing issues with the comparator chosen in clinical testing. Moderna said Wednesday that, following a so-called Type A meeting, the agency agreed to review the approval application for mRNA-1010, with a deadline of Aug. 5. Moderna hopes to secure an FDA nod based on age. It’s seeking traditional approval for adults aged 50 to 64 years old, and accelerated approval for those 65 and older. The company also said it agreed to conduct a post-marketing study in older adults. If approved, the shot could be available to that population for the 2026-27 flu season. "We appreciate the FDA's engagement in a constructive Type A meeting and its agreement to advance our application for review," said Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna. Vaccine makers have faced an uncertain market under the leadership of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vaccine skeptic who has heavily questioned the safety and efficacy of several shots. Moderna has been especially hit. Reeling from lowered sales of its COVID-19 vaccine, the company has been heavily scrutinized for its use of messenger RNA technology. Under Kennedy’s leadership, the Health and Human Services Department canceled millions of dollars in government contracts for mRNA vaccine research. Meanwhile, the FDA set stricter approval standards for COVID shots and issued narrow approvals, while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention softened recommendations for the vaccines. As a result of the challenging climate, Moderna said it would no longer invest in late-stage trials for vaccines and is shifting its focus to oncology. Last week, in an unorthodox move, the company publicly shared the “refusal-to-file” letter that rejected its application. The FDA’s top vaccine official, Vinay Prasad, signed the letter and stated Moderna’s Phase 3 trial testing mRNA-1010 was not “adequate and well-controlled.” Moderna immediately requested a meeting to discuss the candidate’s future. The move sparked backlash from the industry, as reports said Prasad overruled agency reviewers in rejecting the application. In a Wednesday note to clients, TD Cowen analyst Tyler Van Buren wrote that he believes this backlash led the agency to “quickly find an acceptable solution.” He highlighted the “remarkably short turnaround for a Type A meeting,” which typically doesn’t happen for 30 to 60 days after a refuse to file letter is received. Some analysts are still skeptical of the move. Mani Foroohar, in his own note, argued the FDA reversal is a “meaningful positive ... though uncertainty remains.” “It remains to be seen how this more assertive approach to the FDA ultimately impacts the review outcome for mRNA-1010, details of a post-marketing study, and — most financially important for Moderna — approval path for the combo flu/COVID vaccine,” Foroohar added. In an email to BioPharma Dive, HHS Spokesman Andrew Nixon said the “FDA will maintain its high standards during review and potential licensure stages as it does with all products.” Shares for Moderna were up more than 8% at certain points Wednesday morning. Editor's Note: This story has been updated to include a statement from HHS.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
05What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →