Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Evommune files for IPO to advance immune drug work

Dive Brief: Evommune, a biotechnology company developing treatments for chronic inflammatory conditions, revealed plans to go public in a Thursday filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Evommune intends to use the proceeds to support development o

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Dive Brief:

  • Evommune, a biotechnology company developing treatments for chronic inflammatory conditions, revealed plans to go public in a Thursday filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Evommune intends to use the proceeds to support development of a pair of drugs in mid-stage testing for conditions like chronic skin hives, or urticarias, and atopic dermatitis. One, EVO756, targets a protein on mast cells called MRGPRX2. The other, EVO301, binds to IL-18, an inflammatory cytokine. Phase 2 study results for both drugs are expected in the first half of next year.
  • The Palo Alto, California-based company currently has $87 million in cash and cash equivalents, according to the filing. Since its launch in 2020, Evommune raised roughly $267 million in private funding.

Dive Insight:

Evommune believes its lead candidate can become the standard of care for chronic hives. Patients with the immune condition currently rely on antihistamines or biologics such as Xolair or Dupixent . The Food and Drug Administration just approved another medicine, called Rhapsido , as well. In its IPO prospectus, though, Evommune claimed all of those drugs have notable limitations. Xolair and antihistamines don’t work for many of the estimated 3 million people in the U.S. who have chronic spontaneous urticaria. Dupixent hasn’t shown it’s clearly better than standard treatments in people who can’t tolerate, or don’t respond to Xolair, and has trials in the “inducible” urticarias caused by certain environmental triggers. Rhapsido, meanwhile, is associated with certain side effects and drug interactions that complicate use with multiple other medications, the company said. Unlike Xolair and Dupixent, which are injected, Evommune’s treatment is taken orally. The company also claims EVO756 is the only “clinical” approach targeting MRGPRX2, which can impact mast cells as well as certain sensory neurons driving inflammation. The result should be faster-acting relief, the company said. Still, Incyte paused testing of a similar drug last year after reporting concerning findings in a toxicology study. Evommune has two Phase 2 tests underway in chronic spontaneous urticaria and atopic dermatitis. The company also intends to study EVO756 in other diseases linked to mast cells. Behind EVO756 is EVO301, which targets the cytokine IL-18 and Evommune is also testing in a Phase 2 study in atopic dermatitis. Evommune licensed the drug in 2024 from South Korean biotech AprilBio, and said the way in which it binds to and neutralizes IL-18 could yield “differentiated clinical outcomes” for patients. The company also plans to start a trial of EVO301 in people with ulcerative colitis in 2026, and after that, could pursue a study in Crohn’s disease as well as other conditions. EQT Life Sciences and Pivotal bioVenture Partners are Evommune’s largest shareholders, both holding 16.3% equity stakes, according to the filing. Nine biotech companies have gone public so far in 2025, far fewer than the nearly two dozen that had priced offerings by this time last year and the 16 over the same timeframe in 2023 and 2024, according to BioPharma Dive data . Only one company has completed a large stock offering since February. Still, Evommune is one of two to recently make plans to test investors’ appetite for new stock offerings. The other, MapLight Therapeutics , said earlier this week that it may use a little-used section of the Securities Act to price its IPO during the ongoing government shutdown.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →