Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Ethyreal starts up with $101M and takes aim at a pair of immune diseases

Ethyreal Bio emerged from stealth Wednesday with $101 million to advance an experimental drug it believes to have potential treating both Graves disease and thyroid eye disease. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based biotech’s core program is a monoclonal antibody

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Ethyreal Bio emerged from stealth Wednesday with $101 million to advance an experimental drug it believes to have potential treating both Graves disease and thyroid eye disease. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based biotech’s core program is a monoclonal antibody dubbed ETHY-001 and that’s designed to block a protein receptor on the surface of thyroid cells. This protein, “TSHR,” is overactivated in Graves and thyroid eye disease, leading to hyperthyroidism in one condition and eye bulging and inflammation in the other. Ethyreal claims that blocking the activation of TSHR with a drug could halt both diseases. ETHY-001 is also being designed as a long-lasting subcutaneous injection, which could offer convenience advantages over existing treatments. The biotech plans to start its first human clinical trials in the second half of 2026 and will present preclinical data of ETHY-001 at a medical meeting next week. “ETHY-001’s differentiated profile is unique in its potential to address two closely related, debilitating conditions, said board chair Simon Read, in a statement. Graves is an autoimmune condition that occurs when the immune system mistakenly attacks the thyroid gland. It’s closely linked to thyroid eye disease, or TED, an eye-swelling condition catalyzed by the same kinds of errant “autoantibodies.” TED has in recent years become a competitive corner of drug research. The current treatment standard is Tepezza, an intravenous drug Amgen acquired through a large acquisition. But Amgen is working on an injectable version of Tepezza and multiple others, such as Viridian Therapeutics , are developing new alternatives, too. Those therapies only target TED and not Graves as well, however. Ethyreal contends that a treatment able to handle both, while administered in a “patient-friendly” way, could address a critical need. “These two conditions frequently co-exist in the same individual, yet current treatments for [Graves] do not treat or prevent TED, and conversely, TED treatments do not address the hyperthyroidism characteristic of [Graves],” said CEO Niranjan Kameswaran, in a statement. ETHY-001 “has the potential to address both conditions through a single, mechanism-driven therapy.” Ethyreal’s funding came in the form of separate Series A and Series B rounds. The Series A was co-led by Atlas Venture and Medicxi Ventures. Avoro Capital led the Series B, which included all Series A investors.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
05What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →