Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Enzyme’s 3D Pose Could Improve Antibiotic Drug Discovery

Taking clear pictures of megaenzymes isn't easy, but it's definitely worth it. These proteins play an active role in creating many common antibiotics. Prof. Martin Schmeing from McGill's Dept. of Biochemistry has been able to take 3D images of part of a crucia

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Taking clear pictures of megaenzymes isn't easy, but it's definitely worth it. These proteins play an active role in creating many common antibiotics. Prof. Martin Schmeing from McGill's Dept. of Biochemistry has been able to take 3D images of part of a crucial medicine-synthesizing protein in action.

Sending a tiny film crew to capture the molecular actions of enzymes in motion would be an ideal way to study the mechanistic nature of these biological catalysts. However, until Asimov’s fantasy about miniaturization rays becomes reality, the researchers at McGill University will stick to their current methods, which have allowed them to take a series of 3D images from a large section of what are commonly referred to as megaenzymes—the medicine-synthesizing proteins that play an active role in creating many common antibiotics.

Taking clear pictures of megaenzymes hasn’t been easy, but results from a newly published study found that McGill investigators' persistence has paid off. These enzymes are in constant motion, with sections that flip around acrobatically to carry out necessary tasks. The researchers believe that the images they have generated will not only bring scientists closer to understanding how many antibiotics are made, but could, with further research, lead to the development of much needed next-generation antibiotics.

“This is the most complete view we've ever had of these enzymes in action,” stated senior study author Martin Schmeing, Ph.D., professor in the department of biochemistry at McGill University. “Even though megaenzymes are the second-biggest proteins known to man, they are still very small molecules, and they are very mobile, so it's difficult to see them at work.”

The findings from this study were published recently in Nature through an article entitled “Synthetic cycle of the initiation module of a formylating nonribosomal peptide synthetase.”

The megaenzymes are a class of proteins that are essential to the production of antibiotics that range from penicillin to cyclosporine. These proteins, often labeled as nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs), act as catalysts inside specific bacteria, giving them the ability to kill competing bacteria.

NRPSs have been compared to miniature assembly lines, combining building blocks through repetitive chemical reactions. Similar to factory assembly lines, these enzyme assembly lines are made up of different workstations (called modules) that each add on one section of the drug and in the process create antibiotics with new chemical features.

The McGill team was able to utilize chemical traps in order to capture the enzymes in the desired position. Subsequently, the researchers used X-ray crystallography essentially to take a series of 3D pictures of the first module of an NRPS that makes the antibiotic gramicidin (an active ingredient of the commonly used Polysporin cream).

“These 3D pictures revealed the totally remarkable way the NRPS works to synthesize its product. Parts of other NRPSs have been pictured before, but there have never been so many snapshots of the different steps of synthesis, and never pictures of NRPSs that incorporate interesting chemical modifications into the antibiotic,” explained lead author Janice Reimer, a doctoral candidate at McGill. “These pictures reveal the exquisite way these parts repurpose and recycle their limited surfaces to interact with the rest of the enzyme. Once we understand enough, we can use modern bioengineering techniques to modify NRPSs to produce all sorts of products with designer modifications, perhaps giving a veritable treasure trove of new medicines.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →