Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Earnings roundup: Alnylam’s down day, Neurocrine’s head scratch and Biogen’s ‘low quality’ win

With quarterly earnings underway, BioPharma Dive is providing a snapshot of some companies' results and how they're being received by investors. Today, we’re offering insight into the latest numbers from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Neurocrine Biosciences

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

With quarterly earnings underway, BioPharma Dive is providing a snapshot of some companies' results and how they're being received by investors. Today, we’re offering insight into the latest numbers from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Neurocrine Biosciences and Bristol Myers Squibb.

Alnylam battles sky-high expectations

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has been among the industry’s top performers this year. Lifted by a long-awaited drug approval and early signs that therapy is selling well , the company has seen its market value nearly double in 2025, cracking a $50 billion threshold few biotechnology companies ever reach. Alnylam’s latest earnings report seemed to include more good news. Quarterly revenues of about $1.25 billion beat analysis estimates by almost $300 million, leading the company to boost its financial forecasts. That all-important therapy, Amvuttra, also outperformed, generating $685 million versus the $622 million analysts were expecting. And crucially, for Alnylam, the spike in third-quarter Amvuttra sales were an indicator that demand is growing among patients with the heart-related complications of transthyretin amyloidosis, or TTR. The results point to a “bigger-than-expected market that can support multiple players,” wrote Evercore ISI’s Cory Kasimov. Yet by the end of Thursday, Alnylam shares were down by almost 7%, erasing months worth of stock gains. Multiple Wall Street analysts attributed the downswing to Alnylam’s already expensive share price and the fact that “buy side investors” had even higher expectations than they did. Mani Foroohar, of Leerink Partners, wrote that those investors projected Amvuttra to hit $700 million, and that Alnylam’s guidance increase only brought numbers “in line” with their estimates. Third-quarter trends suggest “flattish new patient trends” too, he added. Alnylam also disclosed a subpoena related to its government price reporting. There were no allegations of wrongdoing, but the news pushed shares down, wrote Jefferies analyst Maury Raycroft, after speaking with executives. What’s more, heading into its announcement, Alnylam’s market worth exceeded that of many large-cap drugmakers, at least in terms of sales and earnings multiples, noted Stifel’s Paul Matteis. The company was in a “trickier” spot than usual as a result. “We don’t think the big picture has changed,” Matteis wrote. “We still see TTR as a very large (and growing) market, and we expect [Alnylam’s] dominant position within it to remain.”

Biogen’s ho-hum report

Biogen narrowly exceeded Wall Street’s expectations with its latest earnings report , wherein the company recorded just north of $2.5 billion in revenue during the three-month period from July through September. Biogen’s aging arsenal of multiple sclerosis drugs was resilient during the third quarter, once again accounting for roughly 40% of overall revenue. The performance of three “launch” products meant to spur growth was more muted. Zurzuvae, a medication for postpartum depression, generated $55 million, up from $46 million in the previous quarter. Revenue from Skyclarys, which is used to treat a rare neuromuscular condition, ticked up slightly to $133 million. And sales of Leqembi, a closely watched medicine for Alzheimer’s disease, reached $121 million globally and $69 million in the U.S., where Biogen leads marketing activities. Those totals were $160 million and $63 million last quarter, with the former benefiting from a one-time, inventory-building shipment to China. Biogen now forecasts total revenue this year will be flat to up 1%, a little better prognosis than in the summer, when the company expected no real year-over-year change. It also lowered its annual earnings per share estimates, to a range of $14.50 to $15, because of recent deals. Salim Syed, an analyst at the investment firm Mizuho Securities, described the earnings as a “low quality beat and raise,” while Eric Schmidt, of Cantor Fitzgerald, cast them as “fairly unremarkable.” “While some adult supervision has aided operational performance, the narrative on [Biogen] continues to suffer from lackluster investor appeal. Leqembi is not going to be the growth driver some had hoped. Biogen's pipeline is still immature. And creating a sustainable pipeline through [business development] is difficult,” Schmidt wrote in a note to clients.

Neurocrine’s surprising stock slide

Brain drug developer Neurocrine Biosciences saw a 28% year-over-year increase in net sales during the third quarter, according to an earnings report released Tuesday . The company’s two main products — Ingrezza and Crenessity — together brought in $785 million. Analysts called Neurocrine’s performance “solid” and “strong.” And yet, on Wednesday, shares of the company fell by as much as 9%. Brian Abrahams, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, suspects several reasons for the “mostly unjustified” stock slide. Neurocrine executives, in presenting the results, announced plans to invest another $150 million building out the sales teams for Ingrezza and Crenessity. The expansion, while prudent to RBC team, may also “raise concerns over when margins can inflect,” Abrahams wrote in a note to clients. Additionally, Neurocrine disclosed that, in August, it received a so-called civil investigative demand from the Department of Justice, requesting certain documents and information related to the sale and marketing of Ingrezza. This inquiry might have “spooked” some investors, according to Abrahams, since, based on similar cases, it suggests the DOJ could be investigating Ingrezza kickbacks. But even if that’s what’s happening, such cases often take years to complete and result in settlements, meaning “any impact should be manageable.” Abrahams also flagged some commercial intricacies that could be sticking points for investors, like pricing dynamics for Ingrezza and continuing the successful launch of Crenessity, which secured approval less than a year ago. Such uncertainties “likely overshadowed” what was objectively a “good” quarter, according to Uy Ear, an analyst at Mizuho.

Bristol Myers’ brain drug sparks ‘tug of war’

Carter Gould, an analyst at Cantor, warned early Thursday that Bristol Myers Squibb may see an investor “tug of war” based on its latest earnings report, which, while positive overall, was somewhat weighed down by one of the company’s most talked about new drugs. The drug, Cobenfy, was approved a little over a year ago as a first-of-its-kind treatment for schizophrenia. Bristol Myers bet big on Cobenfy, acquiring it through a $14 billion deal , and, so far, sales have gradually risen. They reached $43 million in the third quarter, up from $35 million in the previous three-month period. By late October, roughly 2,500 prescriptions were being written weekly. Yet, stacked against Bristol Myers’ other products, Cobenfy’s performance could be seen as underwhelming. Gould noted how nearly every product in the company’s “growth” portfolio — which includes the anemia shot Reblozyl, the blood cancer therapy Breyanzi and the heart drug Camzyos — beat Wall Street expectations. Cobenfy was the main outlier. Bristol Myers may change that narrative if Cobenfy proves useful beyond schizophrenia. There, the company has three large trials testing the drug against the psychosis that patients with Alzheimer’s disease often experience. Results from the first of those studies, titled ADEPT-2, could arrive before the end of the year. “As you undoubtedly know, there's heightened investor nervousness around the ADEPT program,” Tim Anderson, an analyst at Bank of America, said during Bristol Myers’ earnings call Thursday. To analysts’ disappointment, the company didn’t unveil results or any significant new details alongside its earnings. According to Sean McCutcheon, from the investment bank Raymond James, the recent failure of a late-stage trial that tested Cobenfy as an add-on therapy to other antipsychotics has put more pressure on the program. That setback, McCutcheon wrote, could increase the perceived risk of the drug ever succeeding in other conditions. Still, the uncertainty surrounding Cobenfy wasn’t enough to pull down Bristol Myers’ share price. A bump in financial guidance and beat in quarterly revenue helped lift shares 7% on Thursday.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
05China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →