Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Disrupting Mechanical Transmission by Titin Protein Precipitates Muscle Diseases

A team at the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC) has developed an innovative method known as TEVs-TTN, for studying the specific mechanical functions of proteins through their controlled cleavage. This process renders the proteins unabl

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

A team at the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC) has developed an innovative method known as TEVs-TTN, for studying the specific mechanical functions of proteins through their controlled cleavage. This process renders the proteins unable to sense and transmit mechanical force. The study, headed by Jorge Alegre-Cebollada, PhD, demonstrates that interrupting mechanical transmission by the protein titin precipitates muscular diseases. This finding opens new routes to understanding muscular dystrophies and other diseases associated with this protein.

Alegre-Cebollada and colleagues reported on their findings in Nature Biomedical Engineering, in a paper titled “Mechanically knocking out titin reveals protein tension loss as a trigger of muscle disease.” In their paper the authors stated, “Here we demonstrate that cessation of force transmission across titin results in severe muscle atrophy and dysfunction correlating with gradual sarcomere depletion…Our findings suggest that slack titin molecules drive muscle disease, potentially through mechanisms shared with other mechanical proteins.”

Titin, named after the titans of Greek mythology, is the largest protein in animals and plays a critical role as the structural linchpin of sarcomeres, the contractile units of muscle cells. “Titin, the elastic protein scaffold of muscle sarcomeres, has multifunctional roles in mechanosignaling and is implicated in muscle disease,” the authors noted. Mutations in the titin gene (TTN) are a leading cause of congenital muscular diseases and cardiomyopathies, added first author Roberto Silva-Rojas, PhD. “Many of these mutations generate a prematurely truncated form of the protein, impeding its correct anchoring in the sarcomeres and disrupting muscle function.” The team further noted, “Consistent with the fundamental functions of the protein, truncating variants in the titin gene (TTN) are responsible for many severe diseases, including dilated cardiomyopathy and congenital myopathies.”

The term titinopathies is now used to refer to many forms of muscle disease when they are caused by titin mutations. “Together with the different types of heart disease triggered by titin variants, the existence of titinopathies makes TTN an important human disease gene,” the scientists stated. However, they commented, “… the underlying molecular mechanisms of these pathologies remain largely unknown.”

To dissect the functional role of titin mechanics, the team carried out site-directed cleavage of the protein by heterologous expression of tobacco etch virus protease (TEVp) in living mice. “This strategy, which we name titin mechanical KO (mKO), results in loss of force transduction across titin’s polypeptide backbone while preserving the total levels of the protein and therefore its non-mechanical functions,” they explained.

Using this system the CNIC team was able to replicate the sarcomere disorganization typical of patients with titin mutations. As Silva-Rojas explained, muscles with cleaved titin showed similar defects to those observed in patients, including cell-volume reduction, nuclear internalization, mitochondrial aggregation, and interstitial fibrosis. “Our results reveal that titin mKO muscles develop a severe form of myopathy recapitulating a number of structural, histological and functional phenotypes in human patients who carry pathogenic TTN variants,” the investigators noted.

One intriguing finding of the study was that titin cleavage caused complete disintegration of sarcomeres over the course of a few days, leaving muscle cells devoid of their basic functional unit within seven days post infection (dpi). “Altogether, immunofluorescence and ultrastructural characterization confirm that titin cleavage by TEV protease results in mechanical unloading of the protein preceding sarcomere disassembly,” the investigators reported. “As a result, many myofibers in titin mKO muscles are fully devoid of sarcomeres from 7 dpi.” Nevertheless, these cells survived, suggesting that similar processes might operate in other situations, such as muscle tears, heart failure, or cardiotoxicity associated with chemotherapy.

The methodology developed at the CNIC marks a milestone in the study of how protein mechanics contribute to tissue and organ physiology. “Our work demonstrates the use of TEVp to achieve protein mKOs in vivo, that is, ceased force transduction across the targeted protein with no alteration of protein levels,” they pointed out.

Just as titin is critical for force transmission in sarcomeres, other proteins, such as dystrophin, dystroglycan complexes, integrins, and lamins, play critical roles in extracellular matrix regulation and cell membrane integrity. “Taking into account enticing observations using optogenetics to mechanically knock out proteins in vitro, the protease-based strategy that we describe here could be exploited to dissect the complex functions of other mechanical proteins, including pathomechanisms of mutant proteins relevant for human disease such as dystrophin, nebulin, integrins, lamins and cadherins.”

The new tool will enable the research team to confirm or refute hypotheses about the functioning of these proteins. These advances, in turn, could pave the way to the development of new therapeutic strategies for many diseases beyond those affecting muscle.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →