Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Covagen, Tanabe Expand Fynomer Therapeutic Collab

Covagen and Tanabe Research Laboratories (TRL), a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (MTPC), are expanding the strategic research collaboration they made in October of 2012 that is focused on using Covagen’s Fynomer-antibody (FynomAb) platform

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Covagen and Tanabe Research Laboratories (TRL), a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (MTPC), are expanding the strategic research collaboration they made in October of 2012 that is focused on using Covagen’s Fynomer-antibody (FynomAb) platform to generate bispecific proteins against two pairs of targets selected by MTPC and TRL. Tanabe nominated the first bispecific FynomAb for formal preclinical development—triggering a milestone payment—and have now exercised an option for a second bispecific FynomAb program based on the 2012 agreement.

MTPC paid an undisclosed option fee for exclusive rights to bispecific FynomAbs against a second target pair in oncology. Per the agreement, MTPC will fund all research activities and be solely responsible for the development, manufacturing, and global commercialization activities. Covagen could receive payments of up to €108.25 million ($146.34 million) for the second program—as well as tiered royalties on worldwide net sales of products resulting from the collaboration—once certain milestones are achieved.

Covagen CSO Dragan Grabulovski, Ph.D., said in a statement that the firms decided to expand the collaboration because the discovery and early preclinical development of the FynomAb from the original collaboration was so successful.

“This FynomAb was generated less than one year after initiating the joint research collaboration and showed excellent activity in predefined in vitro and in vivo studies,” Dr. Grabulovski added. “Our work with the MTPC and TRL team has been extremely productive, and we are eager to continue development of both projects.”

Fynomers, according to Covagen, are small binding proteins that can be engineered to bind an antigen of interest. Covagen can create FynomAbs with tailored architectures by fusing Fynomers to multiple sites on an antibody. The firm currently has an internal lead bispecific anti-TNF/IL-17A FynomAb moving towards first-in-human studies in early 2014.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →