Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Common medicines contain hidden gluten and soy, study finds

Researchers reveal that widely used pain and fever medicines may harbor undeclared gluten or soy ingredients—raising concerns for millions with allergies or sensitivities. Study: Presence of gluten and soy derived excipients in medicinal products and their imp

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Researchers reveal that widely used pain and fever medicines may harbor undeclared gluten or soy ingredients—raising concerns for millions with allergies or sensitivities.

A recent study published in the journal Scientific Reports assessed the presence of soy- and gluten-derived excipients in medicinal products authorized in Portugal.

Food allergies are a major public health concern, and their prevalence has risen in recent decades. Gluten is a protein found in barley, rye, and wheat, and it can cause adverse reactions in individuals with gluten sensitivity. Gluten ingestion causes three clinical disorders: celiac disease (CD), wheat allergy, and non-celiac gluten sensitivity, which have distinct symptoms and characteristics.

Some excipients are used in various pharmaceutical forms, including sodium starch glycolate, starch, and pregelatinized starch, while others are derived from sources such as rye, barley, oats, and wheat. Potato starch and corn starch are also used, as they are gluten-free, making them safe for individuals with gluten-related disorders. As a common excipient, starch is a major source of gluten. However, when “starch” is listed without a specified botanical origin, it complicates allergen identification, as it may derive from wheat or gluten-free sources.

Furthermore, soy is among the top food allergens, frequently causing allergic reactions in children. Soy contains several distinct proteins with varying risks for severe reactions. Besides, soy allergies can manifest as urticaria, oral allergy syndrome, asthma, angioedema, and anaphylaxis. Currently, soy or gluten allergies lack a definitive cure, and the best treatment is to avoid these allergens altogether in diet and medicinal products. However, analyses on the presence of gluten or soy in medicinal products are scarce.

Even trace amounts of allergens in excipients like soy lecithin or starches derived from wheat may be clinically relevant in highly sensitive individuals despite their low protein content.

About the study

In the present study, researchers investigated the prevalence of soy- and gluten-derived excipients in medicinal products in Portugal. First, the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) database was searched for human medicines to identify soy- and gluten-derived excipients. They focused on therapeutic classes most commonly prescribed for adults and children, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antipyretics and analgesics, as well as anti-asthmatics and bronchodilators.

Paracetamol and ibuprofen were selected because of their high national sales volumes, making the study relevant to public health priorities in Portugal.

All medicinal products authorized for marketing in Portugal, with a linked SmPC in the online database (INFOMED), were eligible for inclusion. Branded and generic products, excluding injectables, were considered in all formulations and dosages. Since the dose or quantity of allergen was not specified in the SmPC, the team focused on identifying whether gluten, soy, and related substances were present.

Medicinal products were categorized as non-gluten-free based on the presence of xanthan gum, oats, starch, glucose syrup, wheat, rye, semolina, bran, barley, malt, sodium carboxymethyl starch, gelatinized starch, and pregelatinized starch. Similarly, products were classified as non-soy-free if they contained soy, lecithin, tocopherols, phytosterols, or xanthan gum.

Xanthan gum was treated as a risk factor for both allergens due to its potential production from soy—or gluten-containing sources, and thus, it was included in both classifications by the precautionary principle.

Further, Fisher’s exact and chi-squared tests were performed to assess the associations between the presence of excipients and pharmacotherapeutic groups.

Findings

A total of 308 medicinal products were analyzed. These included 108 antipyretics and analgesics, 115 bronchodilators and anti-asthmatics, and 85 NSAIDs. Sodium carboxymethyl starch and pregelatinized starch were the predominant gluten-derived excipients, while xanthan gum and soy were the most common soy-derived excipients. Xanthan gum and soy were almost exclusively present in NSAIDs, antipyretics, and analgesics.

Pharmacotherapeutic groups were significantly associated with the presence of soy- or gluten-derived excipients. Gluten excipients were more prevalent in antipyretics and analgesics than in NSAIDs, while soy excipients were more prevalent in NSAIDs than in antipyretics and analgesics.

None of the 115 anti-asthmatic and bronchodilator inhalation products contained any soy- or gluten-derived excipients.

Among paracetamol-based antipyretics and analgesics, 51.2% of solid oral forms and 40% of liquid oral forms were not gluten-free, with gluten found most commonly in film-coated tablets (61.1%) and regular tablets (60%).

In contrast, only 4.4% of solid oral NSAIDs contained gluten, and gluten was primarily found in their liquid oral forms (26.7%).

Soy-derived excipients were found in 30% of liquid oral formulations and 33.3% of rectal suppositories of antipyretics and analgesics.

In the NSAID group, 11.8% of solid oral forms and 26.7% of liquid oral forms contained soy, with soft capsules and film-coated tablets being key contributors.

Additionally, there was no correlation between the presence of gluten and the classification of medicines as branded or generic.

However, a significant association was found between the branded or generic classification and the presence of soy-derived excipients (p < 0.05), reflecting formulation differences across manufacturers.

None of the solid oral forms of antipyretics and analgesics contained soy, whereas 30% of the liquid oral forms did, particularly syrups (60%). Among NSAIDs, nearly 12% of solid oral forms and 27% of liquid oral forms contained soy.

Conclusions

The findings reveal varying prevalences of soy and gluten in medications between dosage forms and therapeutic classes. These results have significant safety implications for susceptible consumers. Individuals with gluten sensitivity or celiac disease (CD) should exercise caution when using solid oral antipyretics and analgesics. Individuals with soy allergies should exercise caution when using liquid oral formulations and suppositories.

Liquid formulations and rectal suppositories may offer safer alternatives for individuals with gluten sensitivities, while solid oral NSAIDs may be a lower-risk option for soy-sensitive individuals.

Furthermore, healthcare providers should be aware of the potential presence of these allergens and advise individuals with sensitivities accordingly.

The study authors highlight the need for clearer allergen labeling on medicinal products and caution that reliance on SmPCs alone may not fully reveal hidden allergen sources. They also note that potential cross-contamination during manufacturing cannot be ruled out without direct confirmation from manufacturers, representing a key limitation of the study.

Moreover, manufacturers should clearly label the presence of these allergens to inform consumers and healthcare providers, and explore formulations that eliminate or minimize their presence. In particular, the study emphasizes that excipients listed generically as “starch” should be accompanied by the declared botanical source, such as wheat, corn, or potato, to enable safe selection for allergic individuals.

Proper labeling and increased awareness can help mitigate risks and ensure safer medication use for those with gluten and soy sensitivities.

Overall, the findings highlight the need for more transparency regarding excipients in medicines.

  • Figueiredo A, Auxtero MD, Brás A, Casimiro A, Costa IM. Presence of gluten- and soy-derived excipients in medicinal products and their implications for allergen safety and labeling. Sci Rep. 2025, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-95525-6, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-95525-6

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How important is it to pick the right target in drug discovery? Could artificial intelligence (AI) be used to aid this process?

Picking the right target is absolutely fundamental. I mentioned that over half of failures of new medicines in development are due to us picking the wrong target. Even if we just doubled our success rate at picking the right target, it would have a huge impact on the development of new medicines for people. One of the reasons, and why I think artificial intelligence could be really important in helping us do that, is that, quite often, there may be some data buried in the literature that tells us a target is really good. Equally valuable is the fact that there may be something buried in the literature that tells you a target is not good. It's much harder to publish negative data than positive data. That target invalidation can be just as valuable as a target validation. It's really about being able to tap into all that knowledge and look up all the facts. That would mean that our systems and other people's AI systems can really be much more effective at picking the right target.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
02You have worked across the full drug development pipeline. How has that experience shaped your view of where AI can have the greatest impact in drug safety discovery?

Having worked across different parts of the discovery process, I think broad exposure changes the way you think. I have developed quantum chemistry, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods in research settings, but I have also had the chance to apply them in real discovery environments for materials and pharmaceuticals. That experience has shown me how different parts of the discovery pipeline interact, what their motivations are, and how they communicate. AI and ML have been used in early discovery for many years, but the biggest recent shift is in areas dominated by human processes and communication. Computers can now interact directly with human language and analytical images, opening new applications such as AI research assistants and AI-assisted dossier drafting. That means AI can start to work more collaboratively with scientists, although expert oversight and guardrails remain essential. In nonclinical safety, I think the biggest impact will be AI working alongside safety scientists to unearth key data, connect safety science with earlier discovery and later clinical work, and help process, predict, and summarize important outcomes. That could help safety science integrate more tightly with design, make, and test cycles in discovery, while also interfacing earlier with clinical science. Save a Copy of This Exclusive Interview by Downloading the Free PDF

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
03Are supplements necessary?

Daily, if you eat a balanced diet that includes healthy foods, you technically should not need a vitamin supplement. A healthy diet incorporates lean proteins, healthy fats, grains, fruits, and vegetables. But if you do not have a balanced diet, you may be considering hair, skin, and nail vitamins. Some people prefer supplements, sometimes choosing a multivitamin that can supply all of your essential minerals and vitamins. But taking too much of vitamins or unnecessary supplements is wasteful because the body gets rid of excess vitamins and minerals or, worse, it can be dangerous. The following is a guide to choosing which vitamins you may want to consider supplementing and when. Deficiencies in the nutrients that keep the skin, hair, and nails healthy can cause changes over time. For example, not enough intake of vitamins A and E, along with not enough biotin, can cause scaly and rough skin patches, eczema, and hair loss. If there is a deficiency, vitamins will help. However, if there is no deficiency, there is no clear evidence that supplements will make a difference. No research studies concluded that supplements treat or prevent age-related, natural hair damage or loss or lead to healthier skin. Two studies in the early 1990s did suggest that a biotin supplement may cause the hair to become stronger and strengthen weak nails. However, the studies were small and not reproduced.

Source: www.medicinenet.com ↗
04Why are these clinical trial results so groundbreaking?

There are no targeted treatments approved for pancreas cancer, and we haven't had any significant progress for a long time. We've only come up with different chemotherapy combinations, and those are only moderately effective. This new treatment is staggeringly better than chemotherapy. Usually, when we think of an improvement in pancreatic cancer survival, we think of 25% improvement. This medication actually doubled survival in patients with advanced disease. We have patients who participated in the trial who are still alive, which is unheard of because the five-year survival rate for pancreatic cancer patients is only 13%-14%. If the drug is approved by the FDA, it will most likely become the new standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer and could replace chemotherapy as a first-line treatment.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
05From Spirulina to Seaweed: How are different types of algae integral to human diets?

Algae are photosynthetic aquatic creatures that grow through the consumption of nutrients, light, and carbon dioxide. They are a diverse group of creatures that include tiny single-celled algae and enormous kelp, as well as seaweed 1. Numerous prokaryotic and eukaryotic algae species are desirable food sources for humans due to their inherent qualities 2,3. Human intake of macroalgae such as seaweed and microalgae like phytoplankton dates back many years. Multicellular macroscopic aquatic plants, or macroalgae, are classified into three taxa: Phaeophyceae, or brown algae, Rhodophyta or red algae, and Chlorophyta or green algae. Microalgae, the unicellular counterpart of macroalgae, are categorized in a broader framework that includes prokaryotic cyanobacteria (blue-green algae), Euglenophyta, and Chlorophyta, which are genetically distinct from one another. The ancient populations of Chad and the Aztec culture were already familiar with the cyanobacteria spirulina, which is currently advertised as a superfood in the West 4. In Burma, Vietnam, and India, other cyanobacteria/microalgae, like Spirogyra and Oedogonium, were eaten as food or as a supplement 4. Seaweed is a staple of daily meals in many Asian and Pacific civilizations, including Korea, Japan, and Indonesia, as well as Hawaii and New Zealand 5.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →