Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Chasing Dupixent, a biotech aims to make better antibody drugs for eczema

Dupixent, a drug cleared for eczema and many other autoimmune conditions, is one of the world’s best-selling medicines. But it doesn’t work for everyone, requires frequent injections and acts slowly, leaving opportunities for superior alternatives. The race to

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Dupixent, a drug cleared for eczema and many other autoimmune conditions, is one of the world’s best-selling medicines. But it doesn’t work for everyone, requires frequent injections and acts slowly, leaving opportunities for superior alternatives. The race to one-up Dupixent has become one of the more competitive research pushes in the biopharmaceutical sector, with companies large and small advancing new options that might address the drug’s weaknesses . The prize is a piece of a market estimated to reach $37.3 billion by 2033, according to data analytics firm Grand View Research . One of those entrants is Alameda, California-based Infinimmune, which on Tuesday announced that it raised $75 million in Series A venture funding to back its first two clinical prospects for the skin condition. “The field is clinically crowded in atopic dermatitis, but is not commercially crowded,” CEO Wyatt McDonnell told BioPharma Dive. "From a mechanism perspective, the same thing is true. The existing systemic biologics treat a very specific inflammatory pathway.”

Wyatt McDonnell, a former 10xGenomics employee, is the co-founder and CEO of Infinimmune. Permission granted by Infinimmune

Four injectable biologics are approved to treat atopic dermatitis: Dupixent, Eli Lilly’s Ebglyss, Galderma’s Nemluvio and Leo Pharma’s Adbry. All target inflammatory cytokines like IL-13 or IL-31, and all are injected every 2 to 8 weeks. Infinimmune’s two prospects, IFX-101 and IFX-201, are also biologics — monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-22 and IL-13, respectively. But the company claims IFX-101 has the potential to be a “first and best-in-class” therapy, while IFX-201 could be superior to others like it. Both were built with a technology the company says could lead to therapies that are more durable and powerful. Infinimmune isn’t alone in targeting IL-22 in one way or another. A drug Pfizer once acquired and later scrapped was aimed at that protein, as is a medicine Argenx and Leo Pharma are collaborating on . IFX-201, meanwhile, may have to one-up a number of competitors to stand out. Apogee Therapeutics and Nektar Therapeutics have been developing longer-lasting eczema treatments. Kymera Therapeutics is working on a pill. Attovia Therapeutics, which priced an initial public offering last week, has a bispecific antibody it sees as a possible eczema therapy. But the crowded landscape isn’t daunting to McDonnell, who said Infinimmune’s two drugs could be useful in many other inflammatory conditions, too. Both antibodies could enter the clinic as soon as 2027. “We are aware of the need for aggressive execution on this front,” McDonnell said. Regeneron’s venture arm is part of the group backing Infinimmune’s Series A round. Joining it are Playground Global, which co-led the investor syndicate , as well as nine additional investors such as RA Capital Management and Merck Global Health Innovation Fund. Infinimmune previously signed research pacts with Merck & Co. and Immunome to discover new antibody drugs for unnamed immune conditions, though it has not publicly identified what those prospective medicines will target.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →