Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Cationic peptides inhibit SARS-CoV-2 cell entry

Heparan sulfate (HS) is a cell surface glycosaminoglycan that has been identified as a key entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in association with the well-known angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Some

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Heparan sulfate (HS) is a cell surface glycosaminoglycan that has been identified as a key entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in association with the well-known angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Some preliminary studies have suggested that competitive inhibition or removal of HS can reduce the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to enter cells and thus lessens infection.

In a paper recently published in Pathogens, in silico affinity studies by researchers at the University of Illinois, USA, reveal several potential peptide binding sites required for HS-spike protein and ACE2-spike protein bond formation, and synthesis of suitable peptide inhibitors reveals impaired SARS-CoV-2 cell entry.

In silico docking studies

HS contains a large number of negatively charged sulfate groups and therefore binds to positively charged peptide species with high affinity. Two peptides generated by the group are termed G1 and G2 (LRSRTKIIRIRH and MPRRRRIRRRQK, respectively), the first of which possesses alternating positively charged residues, while G2 bears strings of positive residues. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD), the ACE2 receptor, and the G1 and G2 peptides were modeled computationally, and the bonding interactions between the molecules were explored.

Both peptides were seen to bond with either the receptor binding domain or ACE2 in positions that would interfere with bonding between the proteins, particularly G1. Similar disruptive interactions were also observed between HS and the spike protein, which motivated the group to perform in vitro studies to test viral entry.

In vitro studies

A SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus expressing the spike protein was generated and exposed to HEK (kidney) cells that were incubated with either peptide G1 or G2 one hour before infection. This prophylactic treatment significantly reduced pseudovirus entry at 48 hours post-infection at concentrations as low as 6.1 µg /mL, with similar results for Lund human mesencephalic (neuronal) cells. Untreated HEK cells were burdened with around 5 times as great of a viral load than those treated with 6.1 µg /mL of either peptide, and those treated with 50 µg /mL of peptide bore approximately 12.5 fold less.

LUHMES cells, in comparison, exhibited dozens fold less viral cell entry when incubated with either of the peptides, perhaps due to a differing rate of ACE2 or HS expression compared with HEK cells. The cytotoxicity of the peptides (IC50) towards HEK cells was ascertained to be 1.3 mg/mL and 1.09 mg/mL for G1 and G2, respectively, which suggests good specificity and is promising for a preclinical drug candidate.

To explore the influence of G1 and G2 on HS expression, the glycosaminoglycan was fluorescently tagged on the surface of HEK cells and subsequently exposed to the peptides. Small quantities of HS are naturally found in the nucleus, and G1-treated cells had only this source of HS remaining following treatment, having shed their external HS. Treatment with G2, however, caused internalization of HS rather than shedding. Further studies will be needed to investigate the complete mechanism behind this phenomenon.

Targeting glycoproteins such as HS is a broad-spectrum antiviral strategy, and G1 and G2 peptides have also shown efficacy in inhibiting cell entry in herpes simplex virus type 1. They bind with HS at the 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate site. G1, in particular, demonstrates high affinity towards the TYR453 amino acid residue located on the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain, which has high affinity towards the ACE2 receptor, and therefore G1 is likely to inhibit bonding. Additionally, G1 appears to induce the complete removal of HS from the cell surface, severely impairing SARS-CoV-2 cell entry.

  • Rahul K. Suryawanshi, Chandrashekhar D. Patil, Raghuram Koganti, Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, Joshua M. Ames and Deepak Shukla. Heparan Sulfate Binding Cationic Peptides Restrict SARS-CoV-2 Entry. Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070803, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/7/803.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What supplements really work?

The bulk of vitamins and supplements containing fish oil, biotin, and vitamins A, C, and E can potentially promote nail and hair growth. You can find dietary supplements with higher concentrations of vitamins and minerals that aid skin, hair, and nail health. Fish oil supplements make nails and hair shiny. Fish oil also serves as an agent that can decrease signs of aging. If sun exposure damages the skin, the omega-3 fatty acids in fish oil can help. Biotin, also known as B7, increases hair density and strengthens it. It is found naturally in bananas, eggs, and milk. Vitamins are vital for skin health as well. Vitamin A reduces acne flairs and helps with changes due to aging like wrinkling. A vitamin A deficiency may increase the risk of acne because it becomes difficult for dead skin to slough off hair follicles, blocking pores. Vitamin B lowers the risk of precancerous growths and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Vitamin C is an antioxidant. It leads the fight against free radicals to help stimulate collagen and brighten skin. It also helps to prevent the formation of unneeded melanin that causes uneven skin pigmentation.

Source: www.medicinenet.com ↗
02How much protein is too much?

The idea of an upper limit of protein intake is controversial. Some experts believe the recommended amounts are too low. Others believe we are overconsuming protein. In general, the average person (not a body builder or an elite athlete) does not need high levels of protein and should not exceed 2 grams per kilogram; or about 125 grams per day for a 140-pound person. A main concern with taking in too much protein is an overall dietary imbalance. Consuming excessive protein may lead to inadequate intake of carbohydrates and fats. It's important to maintain a well-rounded diet that includes a balance of all three macronutrients for overall health. In addition, if you increase your protein intake without increasing physical activity, you may be taking in too many calories without expending enough, which could result in weight gain. There is also some evidence that eating a relatively high-protein diet can be problematic for individuals with pre-existing kidney conditions. A diet high in animal protein may pose a higher risk of kidney stones.

Source: www.health.harvard.edu ↗
03Could daraxonrasib be effective against other cancer types?

RAS mutations are one of the most common cancer-causing genetic mutations, and the drug is now being studied in several cancer types. I think it's going to work especially well in tumors that are primarily RAS driven, including colon cancer and lung cancer. It might also work in other cancer types in combination with drugs targeting other genetic mutations, but further research is needed.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
04What are 'dancing molecules'?

Stupp and his team posited that "dancing molecules" might encourage the stubborn tissue to regenerate. Previously invented in Stupp's laboratory, dancing molecules are assemblies that form synthetic nanofibers comprising tens to hundreds of thousands of molecules with potent signals for cells. By tuning their collective motions through their chemical structure, Stupp discovered the moving molecules could rapidly find and properly engage with cellular receptors, which also are in constant motion and extremely crowded on cell membranes. Once inside the body, the nanofibers mimic the extracellular matrix of the surrounding tissue. By matching the matrix's structure, mimicking the motion of biological molecules and incorporating bioactive signals for the receptors, the synthetic materials are able to communicate with cells. "Cellular receptors constantly move around," Stupp said. "By making our molecules move, 'dance' or even leap temporarily out of these structures, known as supramolecular polymers, they are able to connect more effectively with receptors."

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
05What is the concept of the immune self, and how has it evolved over the decades?

Adaptive immunity is the ability of specific lymphocytes to differentiate between self and non-self (foreign) antigens and defend the body by selectively destroying non-self-peptides. This concept is possibly the most crucial factor in several immunological medical domains and is increasingly being explored across cancer immunotherapy, vaccine design, pathogen identification, and autoimmune disorders (including allergies). A growing body of literature elucidates the importance of peptides, short amino acid chains linked via peptide bonds, in providing the adaptive immune system with the information required to effectively distinguish between self and non-self particles. This has resulted in the proposal of the ‘immune self’ concept, which postulates that self-similarity is a fundamental determinant of immune recognition. First introduced by Frank MacFarlane Burnet in 1949, the immune self-concept and its sister, the self-nonself theory, have substantially evolved over the decades. Initially driven by observations from Medawar’s early transplantation experiments, Nils K. Jerne (1974; eigen-behavior theory), Polly Matzinger (1994; danger theory), and most recently, evidence from research conducted independently by Waldmann, Mitchison, and Janeway has refined the immune self-concept from ‘all body elements are self, and foreign elements are non-self’ to the most recent ‘infectious non-self (foreign and usually harmful) versus noninfectious self (safe) elements.’

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
comparison

Comparisons

Side-by-side pages for commonly compared peptides and research compounds.

Source: peptideuniv.com
Research context

Read sources and limitations before applying a claim.

Longevity, Performance & Obesity Research

A research peptide formulation developed to investigate metabolic regulation, mitochondrial function, and nutrient-sensing pathways.

Source: mypeptidematch.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →