Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Bristol Myers’ legacy lift, Biogen’s blue skies and Regeneron’s murky outlook

With quarterly earnings underway, BioPharma Dive is providing a snapshot of some companies’ results and how they’re being received by investors. Today, we’re offering insight into the latest numbers from Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen and Regeneron. Bristol Myer

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

With quarterly earnings underway, BioPharma Dive is providing a snapshot of some companies’ results and how they’re being received by investors. Today, we’re offering insight into the latest numbers from Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen and Regeneron.

Bristol Myers’ legacy lift

Bristol Myers Squibb delivered an earnings report on Thursday that analysts described as solid overall but also mixed, as a couple newer drugs disappointed while most of the pharmaceutical giant’s older products outperformed. Bristol Myers recorded $11.5 billion in revenue over the first three months of this year, a 3% increase from the same period in 2025. A little over half of the total came from the company’s “growth portfolio,” which is hallmarked by drugs like Opdivo, Yervoy, Orencia and Reblozyl, with the remainder coming from a “legacy portfolio.” According to Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Carter Gould, the revenue total was $572 million above the average analyst estimate, a beat “overwhelmingly driven” by this legacy group. The blood thinner Eliquis and the cancer medications Revlimid and Pomalyst were respectively 8%, 22% and 49% above consensus. Opdivo and Reblozyl, meanwhile, were each roughly 5% under. Gould wrote in a note to clients that the legacy portfolio’s performance, though important for near-term cash flows, is “peripheral” to investors’ “overriding focus” on a series of late-stage clinical trials set to readout in the coming months. The trials are testing some of Bristol Myers’ most closely watched drugs, including a new anticoagulant called milvexian as well as two blood cancer therapies known as iberdomide and mezigdomide . Another study is evaluating the company’s schizophrenia medication Cobenfy as a potential treatment for the psychosis tied to Alzheimer’s disease . Positive results could unlock a major market opportunity for a drug that’s off to a slower-than-expected sales start. Bristol Myers has “one of the most impactful clinical catalyst calendars in the second half of this year, with readouts that could support multiple blockbuster indications and meaningfully increase the company’s longer-term growth profile,” wrote Matt Phipps, of William Blair. Bristol Myers shares were up 5% at Thursday’s market’s close. However, analysts believe the data coming in the back half of this year will have a much more significant impact on investor sentiment than earnings pumped up by aging franchises. Though the company is making progress, “we still think more needs to be proven out on the long term revenue trajectory, with the rubber meeting the road [in the fourth quarter] with a plethora of significant Phase 3 datasets,” wrote Sean McCutcheon, from the investment bank Raymond James. In its report, Bristol Myers affirmed previously issued 2026 financial guidance. Revenue should be about $46 billion to $47.5 billion, and earnings per share should come in at $6.05 to $6.35. Numbers are already trending toward the upper end of those ranges, the company said. — Jacob Bell

Biogen’s parting gray skies

Biogen’s latest round of earnings outpaced Wall Street forecasts and fueled a roughly 5% hike to the biotechnology company’s shares on Wednesday. During the three-month period from January through March, Biogen posted $2.5 billion in total revenue and $3.57 in non-GAAP earnings per share. Those figures were above average analyst estimates of $2.25 billion and $2.91, according to TD Cowen. The beat stemmed, in good part, from better-than-expected performances of newer products like the Alzheimer’s drug Leqembi, the Friedreich's ataxia therapy Skyclarys and the multiple sclerosis medicine Tysabri. The three drugs respectively generated $168 million, $151 million and $441 million, reflecting increases of 74%, 17% and 16%. Biogen still warns that top-line revenue will decline by a mid-single-digit percentage this year compared to 2025, as the company’s core multiple sclerosis business continues to erode. Even so, the fresh earnings indicated to at least some analysts that, after several tumultuous years , Biogen finally seems to be through the worst of the storm. “Tailwinds abound,” wrote Brian Abrahams, of RBC Capital Markets, in a note to clients. Abrahams highlighted Biogen’s recent $5.6 billion acquisition of Apellis Therapeutics , which, once closed, would hand the buyer two already approved, immune system-regulating drugs. Later this year, Biogen also expects to reveal data from a closely watched study of “BIIB080,” a kind of genetic medicine designed to reduce the production of an Alzheimer’s-linked protein called tau. While the RBC team remains cautious about BIIB080’s odds of success, they “see a string” of possibly positive catalysts elsewhere in Biogen’s pipeline, including two antibody drugs known as litifilimab and felzartamab. “Against this backdrop, we see investor debate on the stock as shifting away from the base business towards what could drive upside from here,” Eric Schmidt, an analyst at Cantor Fitzgerald, wrote in his own client note. — Jacob Bell

Regeneron’s mixed picture

Regeneron’s first-quarter revenue and per-share earnings of $3.6 billion and $9.47 , respectively, exceeded Wall Street forecasts. But shares nonetheless sank 6% Wednesday on a pair of updates for two drugs investors are keeping an eye on: a high dose version of its flagship eye medication Eylea, and an experimental cancer immunotherapy in advanced testing. Sales of “Eylea HD,” which Regeneron developed to protect its core business against biosimilars and other competitive threats, came in below analysts’ forecasts and totaled $468 million in the first quarter. Moreover, the launch of a pre-filled syringe of Eylea HD that’s easier for physicians to administer has been slowed by issues at a Catalent manufacturing plant in Indiana. Those delays are heightening pressure on Regeneron; Leerink Partners analyst David Risinger noted that five new Eylea biosimilars could launch in the second half of the year. Regeneron also revealed a setback for a cancer immunotherapy, fianlimab, that it’s long hoped can broaden the reach of its cancer drug business. That therapy, which takes aim at the immune “checkpoint” LAG-3, is close to an important Phase 3 readout in front-line metastatic melanoma. The study is testing a combination of fianlimab and another Regeneron immunotherapy called Libtayo against Merck & Co.’s Keytruda, and should produce results by the end of June. But ahead of that readout, Regeneron disclosed that Phase 2 data in lung cancer didn’t support further development. This setback is “unsurprising” given “prior signals” from Regeneron, wrote RBC’s Abrahams. Still, he and Leerink’s Risinger both lowered their share targets for Regeneron given the uncertainty surrounding the Eylea franchise and unclear pipeline progress. Investors will want “more visibility on where/when the prioritized internal R&D investment can manifest in differentiated blockbuster-potential programs,” wrote Abrahams, “especially after several years of perceived pipeline pivots.” Risinger added that his team hopes management will “pursue external transaction activity” to boost the company’s growth prospects. — Jonathan Gardner

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →