Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

BridgeBio chalks up another win for its rare disease research

BridgeBio Pharma on Wednesday said another one of its experimental medicines met its objectives in a late-stage trial, this time in a rare endocrine disorder. The therapy, known as encaleret, met all of its primary and key secondary goals in the study of patie

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

BridgeBio Pharma on Wednesday said another one of its experimental medicines met its objectives in a late-stage trial, this time in a rare endocrine disorder. The therapy, known as encaleret, met all of its primary and key secondary goals in the study of patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia Type 1, or ADH1, an inherited condition that causes low levels of calcium in the blood and excess amounts in the urine. According to BridgeBio, 76% of treated study participants achieved normalized calcium levels in the blood and urine after 24 weeks. Comparatively, only 4% of those on conventional therapy, which includes calcium and vitamin D supplements, hit those marks. A secondary analysis also showed that encaleret corrected levels of parathyroid hormone, which are abnormally low in people with ADH1, in 91% of those who received treatment. That number was only 7% after the initial four-week period when those patients also got supplemental therapy. All responders are off supplements, too. BridgeBio didn’t provide specifics, but said that the drug was “well-tolerated” and safety findings were “generally consistent" with known ADH1 biology. It intends to file for approval of encaleret next year. The findings mark another step forward for BridgeBio, a ‘hub-and-spoke’ biotechnology company with a group of drugmaking subsidiaries. For years, the company struggled to grow its share price, with CEO Neil Kumar contending its unorthodox strategy was underappreciated by biotech investors . That’s changed in 2025, however. Shares have more than doubled since January on the early commercial success of Attruby , a medicine for a type of genetic heart condition. And this week, BridgeBio claimed late-stage study success for two drugs — encaleret and BB-418, a treatment for a form of muscular dystrophy —that are each expected by Wall Street analysts to potentially yield market opportunities of more than $1 billion. In encaleret’s case, the drug could become part of a new treatment standard for ADH1 , a form of hypoparathyroidism. In ADH1, mutations to a gene called CaSR lead the body to produce an errant form of a key protein tasked with regulating levels of calcium and parathyroid hormone. The result is irregular amounts of both, leading to neuromuscular problems and impaired kidney function. People with the disease typically receive supplements and, in some cases, surgery to remove parathyroid glands if their disease can’t be controlled. Encaleret, by comparison, is meant to normalize calcium and parathyroid hormone levels by binding to and dialing down the activity of the CaSR protein. In a research note ahead of the results, TD Cowen analyst Tyler Van Buren said a statistically significant benefit over typical care would be “paradigm shifting,” while a 50% improvement on the study’s main measure — which BridgeBio surpassed — would represent a “home run” scenario. The results “achieved (and sometimes exceeded) Street and company expectations,” wrote Mizuho Securities analyst Salim Syed, on Wednesday. The findings indicate encaleret has the potential “to become an important new standard of care for this patient community,” said Michael Mannstadt, Chief of the Endocrine Unit at the Massachusetts General Hospital and a study investigator, in a statement provided by BridgeBio. BridgeBio has estimated there are about 12,000 patients in the U.S. with ADH1 and that anywhere from 3,000 to 5,000 have uncontrolled or severe disease.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
05Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →