Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Biomarker Indicates Suitability of Stroke Therapy

Scientists have identified a blood protein biomarker they claim can more accurately determine the time of an ischemic stroke onset than current approaches, and potentially increase five-fold the number of patients eligible for thrombolytic rt-PA (recombinant t

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Scientists have identified a blood protein biomarker they claim can more accurately determine the time of an ischemic stroke onset than current approaches, and potentially increase five-fold the number of patients eligible for thrombolytic rt-PA (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) therapy. The protein, GST-n, was identified by researchers at the University of Geneva (UNIGE) working in collaboration with colleagues at Proteome Sciences, through a long-term prospective study that measured levels of 29 proteins in the blood of hundreds of stroke patients and controls. The 29 proteins had previously been identified by Proteome Sciences as early markers of brain damage associated with stroke.

Of these, blood levels of GST-n were found to increase rapidly after the onset of stroke, peaking at three hours and returning to normal by six hours, and providing an indication of whether or not a patient will benefit from thrombolytic therapy. The study is reported in PLoS One in a paper titled “Blood Glutathione S-Transferase-π as a Time Indicator of Stroke Onset.”

By the time a patient reaches hospital with symptoms of an ischemic stroke it can be very hard to determine when that stroke actually began. Patients for whom this time-frame can’t be determined won’t receive rt-PA, which needs to be given within the first 3–4 hours of stroke onset if it is to be effective.

To try and identify a blood biomarker that can provide this predictor, the UNIGE researchers carried out a study to measure levels of 29 proteins on a prospective cohort of 103 stroke victims admitted to the Geneva University Hospital, and another 132 controls. All the patients had been admitted within 72 hours of symptom onset. The results of blood tests from these patients were then compared with those from patients in an independent cohort of acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to a Spanish hospital within the first three hours of stroke onset.

The results showed that GST-n was the most significantly elevated marker in the blood of stroke patients within the first few hours of onset, and even more importantly, demonstrated the best area under the curve and the best diagnostic odds ratios for discriminating early and late stroke patients. In fact, blood levels of the protein accurately predicted the time of stroke onset in over 50% of early stroke patients.

The findings represent a major step toward improving the management of ischemic stroke patients using currently available drugs, claims Jean-Charles Sanchez, Ph.D., who led the study in Geneva. “A simple blood test that matches the therapeutic window of rt-PA is a major advance that we encourage clinicians, pharmaceutical, and diagnostics companies to unite to rapidly bring this into routine practice to improve patient outcomes.”

Proteome Sciences inked a deal with Randox Laboratories in April through which the latter has a license to use Proteome’s plasma biomarkers in the development of products for the early diagnosis of stroke and subsequent monitoring of treatment outcomes. “We expect to complete additional licenses with both diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies to ensure the technology is developed as quickly as possible to be used as a diagnostic tool for the use of rt-PA as a treatment,” states Ian Pike, M.D., Proteome’s COO.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →