Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Avalyn, in pursuit of better lung drugs, banks $300M in an IPO

Dive Brief: Avalyn Pharma on Wednesday raised $300 million in a large initial public offering that’ll support development of a portfolio of drugs for hard-to-treat lung diseases. The Boston biotechnology company priced 16.7 million shares at $18 each, signific

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Dive Brief:

  • Avalyn Pharma on Wednesday raised $300 million in a large initial public offering that’ll support development of a portfolio of drugs for hard-to-treat lung diseases.
  • The Boston biotechnology company priced 16.7 million shares at $18 each, significantly exceeding the roughly $200 million target it had originally set. Avalyn will begin trading Thursday on the Nasdaq stock exchange under the ticker symbol “AVLN.”
  • Avalyn’s offering is the eighth for a young drugmaker in 2026. Those startups have secured a median of $309 million in IPO proceeds, a spike in value compared to previous years that some investors believe will open up opportunities for a broader array of biotech companies .

Dive Insight:

Avalyn is developing treatments for the “progressive” and “idiopathic” forms of pulmonary fibrosis, a rare condition where progressive lung scarring causes difficulty breathing, a decline in organ function and eventually death. According to the company, an estimated 300,000 people in the U.S. have some type of pulmonary fibrosis. They have three marketed medicines that can help manage their symptoms: Ofev, Esbriet and Jascayd . Esbriet, which Roche won approval for more than a decade ago, prevents scar tissue from building up. Ofev, which is made by Boehringer Ingelheim, blocks some of the cell-surface receptors linked to fibrosis. Jascayd, also from Boehringer, slows the decline of lung function by acting on a different target. Those drugs don’t stop the disease altogether, though, and have tolerability issues, leaving an opportunity for young biotechs like Avalyn to capitalize on. Avalyn is making inhalable versions of Ofev and Esbriet that it expects will prove more potent and easier to use. One drug, AP01, is in a Phase 2b trial in progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Another, AP02, is in a mid-stage study in the idiopathic form of the disease. Avalyn expects to present topline data from both of those trials by the end of 2027. A third experimental prospect, AP03, combines Ofev and Esbriet and is set to enter a Phase 1 trial by the end of the year. Avalyn claimed in its IPO prospectus that these specialized, inhalable formulations represent a “more reliable and patient-friendly solution” for the condition. Avalyn is one of many companies working on newer pulmonary fibrosis drugs, however. Positive late-stage results have positioned United Therapeutics to seek approval of its already-marketed medicine, Tyvaso, in idiopathic disease later this year. That form of the condition is also the target of drugs in development at Bristol Myers Squibb , Contineum Therapeutics and startup Celea Therapeutics . The market for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis drugs could be worth as much as $5.8 billion by 2034, according to analytics firm GlobalData . The pace of IPOs in 2026 has, so far, been similar to the slower-than-usual trajectory the sector has experienced over the last five years. Still, two other biotechs — brain drug developer Seaport Therapeutics and blood cancer specialist Hemab Therapeutics — could price offerings this week.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →