Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

aTyr Pharma

Candidate: ATYR1923 Type: Fusion protein consisting of the immuno-modulatory domain of histidyl tRNA synthetase fused to the FC region of a human antibody. Acts as a selective modulator of neuropilin-2 that downregulates the innate and adaptive immune response

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Candidate: ATYR1923

Type: Fusion protein consisting of the immuno-modulatory domain of histidyl tRNA synthetase fused to the FC region of a human antibody. Acts as a selective modulator of neuropilin-2 that downregulates the innate and adaptive immune response in inflammatory disease states.

Status: aTyr said April 21 that it received FDA approval for its IND to conduct a Phase II trial assessing its lead therapeutic candidate ATYR1923 in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory complications. The company cited preclinical results showing that ATYR1923 downregulated T-cell responses, thus dampening the inflammatory cytokine and chemokine signaling implicated in severe COVID-19 cases; improved lung function; and reduced inflammation and fibrosis in multiple animal models of immune-mediated acute lung injury.

The trial will be a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating ATYR1923 in 30 confirmed COVID-19 positive patients at up to 10 centers in the U.S. Enrolled patients will be assigned to one of three cohorts of 10 patients each: A single intravenous dose of either 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg ATYR1923, or placebo. The study will look to show safety and preliminary efficacy of ATYR1923, aTyr said.

COVID-19: 200 Candidates and Counting

To navigate through the >200 potential therapeutic and vaccine options for COVID-19, GEN has grouped the candidates into four broad categories based on their developmental and (where applicable) clinical progress:

● FRONT RUNNER – the most promising therapeutics/vaccines based on clinical progress, favorable data or both.

● DEFINITELY MAYBE – earlier phases with promising partners, or more advanced candidates in development that have generated uneven data.

● KEEPING AN EYE ON… – interesting technology, attracting notable partners, or both, but preliminary data.

● TOO SOON TO TELL – longshots pending additional experimental and/or clinical data.

GEN has also tagged the most common treatment types:

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →