Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

An Alzheimer’s startup emerges with $175M in venture backing

Korsana Biosciences, a biotechnology company making a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, officially emerged from stealth Wednesday with $175 million to round out its portfolio of drugs for neurodegenerative conditions. The startup is built around a program cal

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Korsana Biosciences, a biotechnology company making a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, officially emerged from stealth Wednesday with $175 million to round out its portfolio of drugs for neurodegenerative conditions. The startup is built around a program called KRSA-028, an antibody that targets the buildup of a sticky protein called amyloid beta in the brain. Korsana is betting its drug can help clear amyloid plaque, like already approved treatments for Alzheimer’s such as Eli Lilly’s Kisunla and Eisai and Biogen’s Leqembi, while sidestepping adverse side effects such as brain swelling and micro-bleeds. With KRSA-028, Korsana is aiming to deliver more of the drug past the blood-brain barrier, a historically difficult obstacle for developers using monoclonal antibodies to treat neurodegenerative conditions. Very little of a drug makes it past that barrier, reducing efficacy, and increasing dosage to overcome that can cause safety issues. Korsana is relying on technology to help shuttle its drug through using less frequent subcutaneous administration, which Wall Street analysts have previously said could drive uptake for Leqembi. (Kisunla is only available as an intravenous infusion, while patients on Leqembi can progress to weekly subcutaneous administration, approved last year by U.S. regulators , after 18 months of intravenous infusions.) “Only two disease-modifying therapies have been approved to treat Alzheimer’s, and both carry safety warnings, offer only modest efficacy, and impose a high burden of care,” said Korsana president and CEO, Jonathan Violin, in a statement. “Patients deserve better options than what is currently available.” Korsana plans to have proof of concept data for its drug by the end of 2027. KRSA-028 was developed by Paragon Therapeutics, a so-called hub-and-spoke biotech that launches spinouts focused on a single asset. Its roster of previous “spoke” companies include Apogee Therapeutics and Crescent Biopharma . Korsana has two other unnamed programs in development for neurodegenerative conditions. Korsana was first established with a $25 million seed round in 2024, backed by Fairmount and Venrock Healthcare Capital Partners. Its Series A round, co-led last September by Wellington Management and TCGX, brought in another $150 million from the J.P. Morgan Life Sciences Private Capital, Janus Henderson, Sanofi Ventures, Foresite Capital and more. The biotech is led by Jonathan Violin, a partner at Fairmount and the former CEO of Viridian Therapeutics.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
Research context

Read sources and limitations before applying a claim.

What This Means for Researchers

This convergence of immunology and neuroscience is one of the most exciting fields of study right now. The similarities between LL-37 and Aβ open up entirely new avenues for therapeutic development and a deeper understanding of disease. Could we learn how to control pathological Aβ aggregation by studying how the body successfully regulates LL-37? Could modulating LL-37 levels or its activity be a novel therapeutic strategy for neuroinflammatory diseases? Answering these questions is a formidable challenge. It demands research materials of the highest possible quality. When you're investigating the subtle, concentration-dependent interactions between two peptides that can both help and harm, you simply cannot afford to have impurities or incorrect sequences in your samples. A tiny contaminant could skew aggregation kinetics or trigger an unintended inflammatory response, sending an entire research project down the wrong path. It's a difficult, often moving-target objective. That's the entire reason Real Peptides exists. Our commitment to small-batch synthesis and rigorous quality control ensures that the LL-37 and other compounds researchers use are exactly what they're supposed to be—pure, consistent, and reliable. This level of precision is a non-negotiable element for anyone working on the cutting edge. Our experience shows that breakthroughs are built on a foundation of trustworthy data, which starts with trustworthy reagents. This dedication to quality is something we apply across our full range of peptides. If your lab is ready to explore these complex biological questions, we're here to provide the high-purity tools you need to find clear answers. You can [Get Started Today] and see the difference that uncompromising quality makes. The story of LL-37 and Aβ is a potent reminder that biology doesn't operate in neat silos. The systems that protect us from microbes are deeply intertwined with the processes that can lead to chronic disease and aging. The villain may be a hero in a different context, and the hero's power, left unchecked, can cause its own form of damage. By understanding their surprising similarities, we're not just learning about two peptides; we're gaining a more profound insight into the delicate and often paradoxical nature of life itself.

Source: realpeptides.co ↗

Research areas and applications of Beta-Amyloid (1-42), CAS: 107761-42-2

Neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s research: Used to study how Amyloid beta 1-42 overproduction, impaired clearance, and rapid aggregation drive Alzheimer’s progression due to its high neurotoxicity and strong synaptic impact. Amyloid aggregation and plaque formation studies: Serves as a model for fast β-sheet nucleation, toxic oligomer formation, and the development of protofibrils and mature fibrils using NMR, AFM, and cryo-EM. Neurotoxicity, synaptic physiology, and neuronal function: Used to examine how beta amyloid oligomers disrupt synaptic signaling, alter calcium balance, impair plasticity, induce oxidative stress, and activate apoptosis that contributes to neuronal dysfunction. Anti-amyloid drug discovery and therapeutic development: Utilized to screen aggregation inhibitors, test Aβ-targeting monoclonal antibodies (e.g., beta amyloid 1-42 antibody), evaluate peptide-based therapeutics, and model compound effects that reduce amyloid burden. Biomarker development and diagnostics: Supports CSF and blood biomarker studies focused on decreased peptide levels and its ratio with Amyloid beta (1-40), both strongly linked to amyloid PET imaging and early Alzheimer’s diagnosis. APP processing and familial Alzheimer’s disease research: Used to analyze how APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 mutations shift γ-secretase cleavage toward increased Amyloid beta (1-42), modeling mechanisms of familial Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroinflammation research: Applied to study microglial and astrocytic activation, cytokine release, and inflammatory responses induced by Amyloid beta aggregates that stimulate innate immune pathways. Seeding and cross-seeding studies: Used to examine how it acts as a nucleation seed for Aβ (1-40) fibrillization and how mixed Aβ species form distinct fibril structures in plaques. Comparison studies with Aβ (1-40): Used to compare aggregation kinetics, toxicity, structural stability, and diagnostic relevance with Beta amyloid (1-40).

Source: jpt.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →