Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Amyloid Attenuated by Midkine Protein in Alzheimer’s Mouse Model

Amyloid beta is a peptide that plays a central role in the neurodegenerative pathology of Alzheimer’s disease by aggregating into plaques in the brain. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs, lecanemab and donanemab, both act by lowering amyloi

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Amyloid beta is a peptide that plays a central role in the neurodegenerative pathology of Alzheimer’s disease by aggregating into plaques in the brain. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs, lecanemab and donanemab, both act by lowering amyloid aggregates. However, the limited clinical benefits for Alzheimer’s patients suggest the presence of alternative disease mechanisms. Proteomic profiling of Alzheimer’s disease brains has identified numerous understudied proteins that are highly upregulated with amyloid beta from the early disease stage, but their roles in disease progression are not fully understood.

In a new study published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology titled, “Midkine attenuates amyloid-β fibril assembly and plaque formation,” researchers from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital have shown that the protein midkine plays a preventative role against Alzheimer’s disease by attenuating amyloid beta.

Midkine is a multifunctional growth factor protein that plays a significant role in various biological processes, including development, inflammation, and cancer. Midkine is one of the most correlated proteins with amyloid beta in the proteomic analysis of postmortem human brain tissues of Alzheimer’s.

The mitigation of amyloid fibrils in the presence of midkine was shown by thioflavin T, a fluorescent sensor for amyloid beta assemblies, circular dichroism, negative-stain electron microscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses. Specifically, midkine interferes with specific stages of amyloid beta aggregation by inhibiting elongation and secondary nucleation. Global fitting of kinetic data revealed best fit with the secondary nucleation model, suggesting that midkine mainly targets this pathway.

“Once the amyloid beta assemblies grow, the signal becomes weaker and broader until it disappears because the technique can only analyze small molecules,” said Junmin Peng, PhD, director of the Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics at St. Jude and co-corresponding author of the study. “But when we add in midkine, the signal returns, showing that it inhibits the large assemblies.”

Knockout of the Mdk gene, which codes for midkine, increased amyloid formation and microglial activation in the brain. Mass spectrometry-based profiling of the whole proteome in these mouse models indicated significant accumulation of amyloid beta and amyloid beta-correlated proteins, along with microglial components.

In addition to midkine’s role in inhibiting amyloid beta assembly, the protein also functions as a growth factor that promotes neurite outgrowth and cell survival. Notably, midkine has been shown to interact with several membrane receptors, including low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), which is a receptor for the risk factor APOE in Alzheimer’s development.

The suggested protective role of midkine opens a potential avenue for neurological disease drug discovery. Further research is needed to examine the interactions between amyloid beta and midkine at the atomic level to provide mechanistic insight for the rational design of therapeutic strategies.

“We want to continue to understand how this protein binds to amyloid beta so we can design small molecules to do the same thing,” said Peng. “With this work, we hope to provide strategies for future treatment.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →