Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Amgen Opts-in on Generate:Biomedicines Collaboration for Drug Development

When Mike Nally stepped down as executive vice president and CMO of Merck’s Human Health division, he aimed to have a greater impact on humanity wherever he went than he felt he could at the big pharma. That was a pretty high bar to set, given that Nally overs

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

When Mike Nally stepped down as executive vice president and CMO of Merck’s Human Health division, he aimed to have a greater impact on humanity wherever he went than he felt he could at the big pharma.

That was a pretty high bar to set, given that Nally oversaw Merck’s vaccine group, which was in charge of developing an HPV vaccine that could potentially eliminate cervical cancer worldwide, as well as working on products like Keytruda, which are revolutionizing cancer care across 30 different tumor types.

It does not get much bigger than that.

However, Nally may be flirting with the expectations he set for himself at Generate:Biomedicines, as the company is now beginning to see the translational impact of the company’s generative AI platform which aims to expand the druggability of the protein universe.

Because of their ability to target cryptic epitopes most effectively, Nally, the chief executive, and his team at Generate:Biomedicines have been able to focus their efforts on what they consider to be unique value opportunities in infectious and inflammatory diseases. The natural progression from there, for Nally, is to take on the infectious diseases that affect the most people or have the greatest disease burden.

They started with the flu and COVID-19, two of the greatest killers of all infectious diseases worldwide. In the summer of 2023, their pan-COVID-19 antibody, GB-0669, entered the clinic. But where Nally thinks that GB-0669 will make a splash is not necessarily in the prophylactic treatment of COVID-19. Rather, he thinks the real benefit lies when a cancer patient is headed for chemotherapy and, thus, a major dip in immune system function. That’s when GB-0669 would be administered.

“You’d have six months of coverage or something along those lines, as you are more vulnerable,” Nally told GEN Edge shortly before the company’s presentation at the 42nd Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference. “You could dose this biannually for the elderly population. You could do it for transplant patients.”

For inflammatory disease, Nally has pointed Generate:Biomedicines toward asthma. The first patient was dosed with Generate:Biomedicines’ anti-TSLP antibody GB-0895 for asthma in December 2023.

Nally said they have scaled up several development-stage assets with “best-in-class” profiles to add to their work on infectious and inflammatory diseases. These include an anti-hemagglutinin (HA) monoclonal antibody that targets the flu and a highly potent anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibody for some type-2 inflammation-mediated diseases, such as atopic dermatitis.

But Nally cannot depend on the bandwidth and financing, of which they have plenty, having raised the highest series C in biotech in 2023. To make the impact he envisions, Nally and Generate:Biomedicines need partnerships.

That’s why the announcement that Amgen has exercised its rights under an existing collaboration agreement with Generate:Biomedicines to opt in for a sixth program is noteworthy. This represents the first expansion of the original agreement. Amgen will make an undisclosed upfront payment and will pay up to $370 million in future milestones and royalties up to double digits for this new program.

The original collaboration agreement signed two years ago was initially a five-target collaboration, with Amgen paying Generate:Biomedicines $50 million upfront and providing some equity financing into the series C financing. The agreement also outlined the opportunity for Generate:Biomedicines to earn up to $370 million in milestones on each of the five targets.

There was also the provision for Amgen to exercise the right to opt into more targets for additional economic consideration, and this is the first of those additional opt-ins.

“The way the deal works is that anything that we are working on ourselves or a series of reserve targets are off limits to Amgen, or, at a minimum, we can say, ‘Do we want to do that outside of that universe?’” said Nally. “[Amgen] can nominate any target across any disease area for us to work on, and that structure has worked well. They give us some of the challenges they’ve had a hard time solving in their labs. Amgen brings a wealth of expertise in… engineering, manufacturing, clinical development, and commercialization, and we bring our unique approach to applying machine learning to protein design.”

So, is Nally living up to his expectations?

It’s too early to tell how big a splash generative AI can make in drug development—the field is in its nascent stages.

Amgen’s move coincides with David Reese, MD, the key architect of Amgen’s artificial intelligence and advanced technology initiatives with a focus on R&D, taking on the CTO role. The move opened up the head of R&D position, which Jay Bradner, MD, will fill as he looks to pursue the next chapter of scientific contribution after leaving Novartis in 2022, much like Nally is doing.

It’s possible that the therapeutics born out of work at Generate:Biomedicines will create an asteroid-driven tsunami that will shake the entire world. It’s also possible that the splash will cause no more than a ripple from a raindrop. With somewhere over $400 million in runway cash and Amgen’s decision to opt-in to the collaboration with Generate:Biomedicines (for perhaps not the last time), it’s possible that in a few years, we’ll experience the kinds of waves that the surfers in The Endless Summer dreamed of.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How Was Keytruda Studied for NSCLC?

The FDA approved Keytruda for NSCLC based on several clinical trials. Keytruda was studied in people whose NSCLC had spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) and who had received no prior treatment for their cancer. People in this trial got either Keytruda plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy. There were 616 people in this trial. Two-thirds of them were in the Keytruda group, the other third was in the placebo group. This study looked at overall survival (OS), which measured how long people survived after getting their treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS), which looked at how long people lived without their cancer growing. The median age was 64 with ages ranging from 34 to 84. There were more men in the Keytruda group (62%), and most of the people in each group were current or former smokers (88%). Most of the people in the study were White (94%) and 3% were Asian. At one year, the estimated OS was 69.2% for people in the Keytruda group versus 49.4% for the placebo group. This means people in the Keytruda group lived significantly longer. The median PFS in the Keytruda group was 8.8 months as compared to 4.9 months in the placebo group. This means that at least half of the people who received Keytruda had not had their cancer get worse after 8.8 months, compared to 4.9 months who received placebo. Keytruda was also studied in people who had NSCLC that was positive for PDL-1 and progressed after chemotherapy. People in this trial got either Keytruda 2 mg/kg, Keytruda 10 mg/kg, or chemotherapy. There were 1,475 people in this study, and they were evenly distributed between all three groups. The ages for each group ranged from 56 to 69 with 63 as the median age. There were more men in each group than women (about 62%). Most of the people in the study were white (72%) and 21% of people were Asian. This study looked at OS and PFS between all three groups. Median OS was 10.4 months for the Keytruda 2 mg/kg group, 12.7 months for the Keytruda 10 mg/kg group, and 8.5 months for the chemotherapy group. There was no difference in how long it took people's cancer to progress between the three groups. Another study looked at Keytruda in people who had planned surgery for their NSCLC. People in this study received either Keytruda and chemotherapy or placebo and chemotherapy before their surgery, and either Keytruda or placebo alone after their surgery. There were 797 people in this study, and they were split almost evenly between the two study groups. This study included people who had NSCLC and had not received any treatment for their cancer prior to the study. The median age of people in this trial was 64 with ages ranging from 26 to 83. Most of the people in this trial were men (about 70%). Most people were white (61%), 31% were Asian, 2% were Black, 9% were Hispanic or Latino, and for 4% the race was not reported. About 70% of people had stage III NSCLC with the rest being stage II. This study looked at event-free survival, which measures how long people lived without having an event including progression, recurrence (cancer coming back), or death. OS was also measured in this study. The estimated percentages of people alive without an event at 24 months was 62.4% in the Keytruda group and 40.6% in the placebo group. This means that at two years, 62.4% of people who received Keytruda had not had a cancer event, compared to 40.6% in the placebo group. There was no significant difference in OS rates at 24 months found between the Keytruda and placebo groups.

Source: www.webmd.com ↗
02What are the serious side effects of Keytruda?

While less common, the most serious side effects of Keytruda are described below, along with what to do if they happen. Severe Allergic Reactions. Keytruda may cause allergic reactions, which can be serious. Stop using Keytruda and get help right away if you have any of the following symptoms of a serious allergic reaction.

Source: www.webmd.com ↗
03When will I need to stop Keytruda treatment?

Your doctor may have you stop Keytruda treatment early if: your cancer isn’t responding well to Keytruda, or you’re having bothersome or severe side effects from the drug But, even if your cancer remains stable and you’re tolerating Keytruda’s side effects, your doctor may have you stop treatment after a certain amount of time. This is because the long-term effects of Keytruda aren’t known. In studies, the length of Keytruda treatment was limited to about 2 to 3 years. But this depended on the type of cancer being treated. Talk with your doctor to find out how long you might need to take Keytruda.

Source: www.healthline.com ↗
04How does Keytruda work?

Keytruda belongs to a group of drugs called programmed death receptor-1 inhibitors. It’s also a type of immunotherapy. This means that it helps your immune system attack cancer cells. To learn about Keytruda’s mechanism of action, see this article about how Keytruda works.

Source: www.medicalnewstoday.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →