Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Alzheimer’s Plaques Co-Accumulate with Potential Biomarker or Target Proteins

Amyloid beta deposits long known to build up in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients have been found to serve as a kind of scaffold for the accumulation of other proteins. Because many of these proteins have known signaling functions, their presence

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Amyloid beta deposits long known to build up in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients have been found to serve as a kind of scaffold for the accumulation of other proteins. Because many of these proteins have known signaling functions, their presence around the amyloid accumulations, known as plaques, could be the culprit causing brain cell damage rather than the amyloid itself.

This finding, from Emory University scientists, was described August 9 in Cell Reports Medicine, in an article titled, “Integrative proteomics identifies a conserved Aβ amyloid responsome, novel plaque proteins, and pathology modifiers in Alzheimer’s disease.”

“[We] compare AD brain proteome and network changes with the brain proteomes of amyloid β (Aβ)-depositing mice to identify conserved and divergent protein networks with the conserved networks identifying an Aβ amyloid responsome,” the article’s authors wrote. “Proteins in the most conserved network (M42) accumulate in plaques, cerebrovascular amyloid, and/or dystrophic neuronal processes, and overexpression of two M42 proteins, midkine (Mdk), and pleiotrophin (PTN), increases the accumulation of Aβ in plaques and CAA.

“M42 proteins bind amyloid fibrils in vitro, and MDK and PTN co-accumulate with cardiac transthyretin amyloid. M42 proteins appear intimately linked to amyloid deposition and can regulate amyloid deposition, suggesting that they are pathology modifiers and thus putative therapeutic targets.

In the brains of those who suffer from Alzheimer’s, amyloid beta is known to form sticky plaque that is associated with disrupted brain functions and cognitive decline. However, mechanistic details have remained unclear. According to the most widely adopted hypothesis, the amyloid beta buildup disrupts cell-to-cell communication and activates immune cells in a process that eventually destroys brain cells.

In the new study, which presents work that was led by Todd E. Golde, MD, PhD, director of the Emory Center for Neurodegenerative Disease in the Goizueta Institute, a new hypothesis is suggested. A different role is proposed for amyloid beta, a simple protein that forms in all brains but normally dissolves out by natural processes.

Golde’s team used cutting-edge analytical technologies to identify and measure the level of more than 8,000 proteins in human brains with Alzheimer’s, as well as similar proteins in mice. Focusing on proteins whose levels increased most dramatically, they identified more than 20 proteins that co-accumulate with amyloid beta in both the human brains with Alzheimer’s and the mice. As the research continues, they suspect they’ll find more.

“Once we identified these new proteins, we wanted to know whether they were merely markers of Alzheimer’s or if they could actually alter the disease’s deadly pathology,” Golde said. “To answer that, we focused on two proteins, midkine and pleiotrophin. Our research showed they accelerated amyloid aggregation both in the test tube and in mice. In other words, these additional proteins may play an important role in the process that leads to brain damage rather than the amyloid itself. This suggests they might be a basis for new therapies for this terrible brain affliction that’s been frustratingly resistant to treatment over the years.”

While the basics of Alzheimer’s have been understood for more than a century, the search for a cure has been slow, often marked by repeated cycles of initially promising treatments that didn’t work in trials, as well as continuing controversy over competing theories to best explain how the disease damages the brain. As the researchers put it, “The initial notion of a purely linear amyloid cascade is now recognized as simplistic. Multi-omic studies have unveiled the vast complexity of changes occurring over decades in the brains of individuals as Alzheimer’s pathologies emerge.”

Significantly, multiple kinds of amyloid buildup, besides amyloid beta, have been implicated in more than 30 human disorders affecting tissues and organs throughout the body. Because this new research proposes a novel process by which Alzheimer’s develops, it may allow for fresh approaches to discovering treatment targets for other diseases as well.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →