Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Alzheimer’s May Start in Body, Not Just Brain

Alzheimer’s disease may move, cancer like, from place to place in the body, lodging in the brain after originating in peripheral tissues. Just how much Alzheimer’s begins in the body as opposed to the brain remains unclear. But Alzheimer’s of bodily origin cou

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Alzheimer’s disease may move, cancer like, from place to place in the body, lodging in the brain after originating in peripheral tissues. Just how much Alzheimer’s begins in the body as opposed to the brain remains unclear. But Alzheimer’s of bodily origin could justify the search for drugs that would attack the disease before it could cross the blood–brain barrier, which weakens as we age. Such drugs could target the kidney or liver, rather than act directly on the brain, which is complex, sensitive, and often hard to reach.

The cancer-like mobility of Alzheimer’s disease was demonstrated through a technique called parabiosis—the surgical union of two specimens to allow them to share a blood supply. This technique was used by scientists based at the University and British Columbia (UBC) and Third Military Medical University in Chongqing to keep pairs of mice together for several months. Normal mice, which don't naturally develop Alzheimer's disease, were joined to transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice, that is, mice modified to carry a mutant human gene that produces high levels of amyloid-beta (Aβ).

Aβ, a protein that can form plaques and smother brain cells, is generated in both brain and peripheral tissues. Although it is believed that Aβ that clumps in the brain originates from brain tissue itself, the parabiosis study was designed to evaluate whether circulating Aβ could contribute to brain pathologies resembling Alzheimer’s disease.

Detailed results from the study appeared October 31 in the journal Molecular Psychiatry, in an article entitled “Blood-Derived Amyloid-β Protein Induces Alzheimer’s Disease Pathologies.” The article presented the observation that human Aβ originating from transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice entered the circulation and accumulated in the brains of wild-type mice, forming cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Aβ plaques after a 12-month period of parabiosis.

“AD [Alzheimer's disease]-type pathologies related to the Aβ accumulation including tau hyperphosphorylation, neurodegeneration, neuroinflammation and microhemorrhage were found in the brains of the parabiotic wild-type mice,” the authors of the study detailed. “More importantly, hippocampal CA1 long-term potentiation was markedly impaired in parabiotic wild-type mice.”

The article’s senior authors, UBC’s Weihong Song, Ph.D., and Chongqing’s Yan-Jiang Wang, M.D., Ph.D., emphasized that the Aβ traveled from the genetically modified mice to the brains of their normal partners, where it accumulated and began to inflict damage. The normal mice not only had accumulated plaques, they also developed a pathology similar to “tangles”—twisted protein strands that form inside brain cells, disrupting their function and eventually killing them from the inside-out.

Other signs of Alzheimer's-like damage included brain cell degeneration, inflammation, and microbleeds. In addition, the ability to transmit electrical signals involved in learning and memory—a sign of a healthy brain—was impaired, even in mice that had been joined for just four months.

Besides the brain, Aβ is produced in blood platelets, blood vessels, and muscles, and its precursor protein is found in several other organs. But until these experiments, it was unclear if Aβ from outside the brain could contribute to Alzheimer's disease. This study, asserted Song, shows it can.

“The blood–brain barrier weakens as we age,” noted Song. “That might allow more Aβ to infiltrate the brain, supplementing what is produced by the brain itself and accelerating the deterioration.”

Song envisions a drug that would bind to Aβ throughout the body, tagging it biochemically in such a way that the liver or kidneys could clear it. “Alzheimer's disease is clearly a disease of the brain,” he stated, “but we need to pay attention to the whole body to understand where it comes from, and how to stop it.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →