Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Advertorial: Rapid Synthesis of Difficult Peptides Using a Novel Resin

May 1, 2015 (Vol. 35, No. 9) A major problem in solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) is aggregation and poor solvation leading to incomplete deprotection and/or coupling steps, resulting in low crude purity peptides.1 This phenomenon is aggravated in the case

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

May 1, 2015 (Vol. 35, No. 9)

A major problem in solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) is aggregation and poor solvation leading to incomplete deprotection and/or coupling steps, resulting in low crude purity peptides.1 This phenomenon is aggravated in the case of longer peptides and those which contain hydrophobic segments where deprotection and coupling efficiencies are dramatically reduced as the peptide chain aggregates. The subsequent purification of the crude peptide mixture becomes a complex and time-consuming task, often requiring repeated chromatography runs, which leads to a reduction in yield of the target peptide.2

The application of microwave energy to peptide synthesis has made significant improvements in reducing aggregation, increasing peptide purity, and shortening synthesis times.3 More recently, the introduction of High Efficiency SPPS (HE-SPPS) has taken many of the advantages gained from microwave synthesis one step further. Based on chemical and instrumentation improvements, the HE-SPPS process has improved synthetic purities while reducing cycle times down to 4 minutes with up to 90% reduction in waste.4 The Liberty Blue™ Peptide Synthesizer (Figure 1) was designed to automate the HE-SPPS process and allows a 15mer peptide to be synthesized in only an hour at high purity and with minimum waste.

The properties of a resin are well known to have a major impact on the quality of a peptide made by SPPS. Therefore, we searched for improvements to resin properties to build on the synthetic improvements realized with the Liberty Blue automated microwave peptide synthesizer using HE-SPPS methodology. In our investigation we focused on Spheri­Tide® resins, which are unique compared to traditional polystyrene and PEG-based resins. They are made from poly-ε-lysine cross-linked with a deficiency of homo-bifunctional carboxylic acid that provides a chemical environment composed of amide bonds similar to a peptide backbone. The result is a hydrophilic, peptide-like backbone that can reduce the tendency for intramolecular peptide aggregation. Additionally, the growing peptides themselves are built off the α-amine sites which, due to the highly structured nature of Spheri­Tide resin, are spaced with a minimum distance between each other. This avoids clustering of linker sites thereby allowing high purity syntheses even at loadings greater than 1 mmol/g.

Figure 1. Liberty Blue Peptide Synthesizer

The final step in generating a high-quality peptide is the cleavage step. The Accent™ Peptide Cleavage System can perform microcleavage to check progress during a complicated synthesis as well as full cleavage upon synthesis completion. Unlike traditional cleavage techniques, the Accent can complete microcleavage in as little as 2 minutes and full-scale cleavage in 30 minutes or less.

In order to test the SpheriTide resin and further explore the HE-SPPS methodology of the Liberty Blue, two peptides were chosen to study. EGFRvIII and 1–42β−amyloid were selected based on known synthetic challenges. All peptides were first synthesized using polystyrene resin, then tested with either high loading or low loading Rink amide SpheriTide resin.

Results

The EGFRvIII (LEEKKGNYVVTDHC) was synthesized to compare HE-SPPS and standard room temperature synthesis. Standard room temperature conditions with low loading Rink amide MBHA PS (Loading = 0.38 mmol/g) produced only a trace amount of product. This is consistent with published reports where multiple deprotections were required after each coupling (up to 8 in some cases) and >12 hour couplings were used to obtain crude purities of 40–70%.5 The same resin under HE-SPPS conditions produced product with 72% crude purity in little over an hour total time.

Advantageously, the higher loading Rink amide SpheriTide resin (loading = 1.05 mmol/g) achieved the same result, demonstrating that the unique properties of the resin can allow it to compete with other low loading resins in certain difficult sequences (Table 1). The higher crude purity of the high loading resin could be attributed to (1) the hydrophilic nature of the resin, which prevents intra-chain aggregation of the growing peptide and (2) the even distribution of initiation sites.

To further demonstrate the versatility of HE-SPPS and SpheriTide, highly complex 1–42β-amyloid (DAEFRHDSGYEVHHQKLVFFAEDVGSNKGAIIGLMVGGVVIA), a notoriously difficult sequence, was prepared. 1–42β-amyloid is well-known for being challenging both synthetically and analytically. Using Rink amide SpheriTide (LL) (loading = 0.17 mmol/g), the sequence was synthesized in 65% crude purity by UPLC-MS (Figure 2).

Figure 2. UPLC-MS of 1-42ß-amyloid.

Conclusion

SpheriTide resin, when coupled with HE-SPPS techniques on the Liberty Blue Peptide Synthesizer, results in high-quality peptides in a short timeframe. Upon sequence completion, the peptide can easily be cleaved and high yields retained using the Accent. Even challenging sequences can be prepared with high crude purities in high yields.

CEM Peptides

Michael J. Karney

Life Science Product Manager

References

1. Rovero, P. In Solid Phase Synthesis. A Practical Guide; Kates, S. A.; Albericio, F., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2000; Chapters 1-6.

2. Quibell, M.; Johnson, T. In Fmoc Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis. A Practical Approach; W. C. Chan, P. D. White, (Eds.); Oxford University Press: New York, 2000; Chapters 1-2.

3. References include: (a)Yu, H. M.; Chen, S. T.; Wang, K. T.; J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 4781. (b) Erdélyi, M.; Gogoll, A.; Synthesis, 2002, 11, 1592. (c) Vanier, G. S. In Microwave Heating as a Tool for Sustainable Chemistry; Leadbeater, N. E., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2010; Chapter 9, p 231. (d) Palasek, S. A.; Cox, Z. J.; Collins, J. M.; J. Pept. Sci., 2007, 13, 143. (e) Collins, J. M. Microwaves in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Hoz, A., Loupy, A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2013; Vol. 2, Chapter 20, p 897.

4. Collins, J.M.; Porter, K.A.; Singh, S.K.; Vanier, G.S.; Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 940.

5. Finneman, J.I.; Pozzo, M. J.; J. Pep. Sci. 2012, 8, 511.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What was done in this study?

In the study, published in Scientific Reports, the researchers built on their earlier discovery of the peptide called AC253. This compound was tested in mice with AD. It was found to block the attachment of beta-amyloid to a brain cell receptor called the amylin receptor, and thus inhibit its toxic effects, as shown by an improvement in spatial memory. However, it is difficult to administer this compound because it doesn’t cross the blood-brain barrier in large amounts, and is quickly broken down in the blood. The dosage must therefore be massively increased, pushing up the amounts required for efficacy and increasing the difficulty of administration, besides enhancing the chances of an immune reaction. One way out is to convert the formulation into a pill rather than an injectable form. The complex structure of AC253 makes this difficult as well. Instead, the team devised an ingenious solution. They cleaved the compound into smaller amylin peptides, or chains of 12-14 amino acids, and tested each for its anti-amyloid activity in old mice which showed signs of AD. In this way, they found two short peptides that had the same effects as the larger compound. In particular, the researchers identified a segment that was common to both peptides, namely, SQELHRLQTY.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
03What roles does the system play?

The endogenous opioids and their receptors are widely distributed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems, particularly the parts of these systems that regulate pain, emotion, reward, stress responses, motivation, drug addiction, and autonomic control. The differential expression and location of the various receptor subtypes across different neurons account for the wide range of opioid-related behaviors. The activation of µ-opioid receptors is mainly known for playing a role in pain relief. Still, research has also indicated it may be involved in behaviors related to survival, such as appetite and reproduction. The activity of µ-opioid receptors is also known to play a critical role in responses to social stimuli by modulating responses to social rejection or social acceptance, for example. Activation of the δ-opioid receptors and κ-opioid receptors is also known to be involved in pain modulation. Also, studies have shown that NOP activation is involved in pain mechanisms and several behaviors related to psychological stress. Alterations in the endogenous opioid system are suspected to be involved in Parkinson's disease, seizures, neuroprotective mechanisms, and depression.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
04What are functional peptides?

Conventional pharmacological studies on spices have traditionally focused on secondary metabolites like polyphenols, alkaloids, and terpenes. More recently, food science research has also examined spice proteins and their enzymatic hydrolysates, using proteomic methods such as liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to identify short bioactive peptide sequences released from larger precursor proteins.6 Once released during food processing, fermentation, or gastrointestinal digestion, these functional peptides can act as metabolic regulators, antimicrobials, or antioxidants.1 Functional peptides refer to specific protein fragments that, once released from their parent proteins, exert biological activities.1,2 In the context of foods, these activities are most often demonstrated using in vitro biochemical or cell-based assays, and their physiological relevance depends on bioavailability and dose.2 Unlike intact proteins, which can have the potential to be allergenic or difficult to absorb due to their complex tertiary structures, functional peptides may exhibit improved bioaccessibility, and some small peptides can cross the intestinal epithelial barrier via peptide transport systems. However, absorption efficiency varies substantially by peptide sequence and digestive conditions.6 Nutriomics and mechanistic investigations have established that the bioactivity of a peptide is dictated by its physicochemical properties, particularly its amino acid composition, molecular weight, and net charge. For example, the presence of hydrophobic amino acids like proline, leucine, and valine often correlates with high antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory activity.2,3 Smaller peptides, typically those less than three kilodaltons (kDa) in size, exhibit greater stability against proteolytic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract.3 Moreover, cationic peptides are particularly effective as antimicrobial agents through their electrostatic interactions with bacterial membranes.3

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
05What is the concept of the immune self, and how has it evolved over the decades?

Adaptive immunity is the ability of specific lymphocytes to differentiate between self and non-self (foreign) antigens and defend the body by selectively destroying non-self-peptides. This concept is possibly the most crucial factor in several immunological medical domains and is increasingly being explored across cancer immunotherapy, vaccine design, pathogen identification, and autoimmune disorders (including allergies). A growing body of literature elucidates the importance of peptides, short amino acid chains linked via peptide bonds, in providing the adaptive immune system with the information required to effectively distinguish between self and non-self particles. This has resulted in the proposal of the ‘immune self’ concept, which postulates that self-similarity is a fundamental determinant of immune recognition. First introduced by Frank MacFarlane Burnet in 1949, the immune self-concept and its sister, the self-nonself theory, have substantially evolved over the decades. Initially driven by observations from Medawar’s early transplantation experiments, Nils K. Jerne (1974; eigen-behavior theory), Polly Matzinger (1994; danger theory), and most recently, evidence from research conducted independently by Waldmann, Mitchison, and Janeway has refined the immune self-concept from ‘all body elements are self, and foreign elements are non-self’ to the most recent ‘infectious non-self (foreign and usually harmful) versus noninfectious self (safe) elements.’

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
comparison

Comparisons

Side-by-side pages for commonly compared peptides and research compounds.

Source: peptideuniv.com
Research context

Read sources and limitations before applying a claim.

Longevity, Performance & Obesity Research

A research peptide formulation developed to investigate metabolic regulation, mitochondrial function, and nutrient-sensing pathways.

Source: mypeptidematch.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →