Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Aberrant Nuclear Transport Key to ALS Progression

Antibodies surround a healthy motor neuron cell (left) and move to the outer cell membrane in ALS (right). [University of Toronto] Degenerative motor neuron diseases are progressive disorders with complex molecular origins that still elude scientists. However,

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Antibodies surround a healthy motor neuron cell (left) and move to the outer cell membrane in ALS (right). [University of Toronto]

Degenerative motor neuron diseases are progressive disorders with complex molecular origins that still elude scientists. However, researchers at the University of Toronto believe they may have solved a critical part of the intricate puzzle that leads to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Frontotemporal dementia (FTD).

ALS is a neuromuscular disease that begins as a mild muscle weakness and progresses to complete paralysis. FTD is closely linked to ALS and leads to memory loss, behavior changes and difficulties with movement and speech. Genetic mutations are known to be an underlying cause of these two disorders, but until now scientists weren't sure how a specific gene caused these devastating diseases.

“Researchers knew that mutations in a specific gene caused 40% of inherited cases of ALS, but there are few studies of the normal function of this gene,” explained senior author Janice Robertson, Ph.D., professor in the department of laboratory medicine and pathobiology at the University of Toronto. “Other scientists have focused on how the gene's mutation causes disease. We've developed the first antibodies to track what this gene does in both a normal and diseased cell.”

Using these newly developed antibodies, Dr. Robertson’s team was able to track proteins from a gene thought to be essential to ALS progression—C9orf72. The investigators discovered that a specific protein from this gene might help transport other essential proteins in and out of a motor neuron cell's nucleus.

The findings from this study were published recently in the Annuals of Neurology through an article entitled “Isoform-specific antibodies reveal distinct subcellular localizations of C9orf72 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.”

“We saw that a protein from C9orf72 normally surrounds the nucleus of a motor neuron cell,” said Dr. Robertson. “But in ALS or FTD, this protein moves to the outer membrane of the cell. When this protein is misplaced, it can't help other proteins move in and out of the cell's nucleus, and the cell dies.”

The University of Toronto’s discovery of the mistargeting for the C9orf72 protein in ALS, led them to hypothesize that this gene must be important for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, which could have a tremendous impact on the pathophysiology of ALD and FTD. Now, the researcher team is looking to understand exactly how C9orf72 is involved in transporting these proteins—with the hope of finding a druggable target in the process.

“This pathway is easily targeted with drugs that already exist,” noted lead author Shangxi Xiao, M.D., Ph.D., research fellow at the University of Toronto. “If we can restore function to this pathway and make proteins go back to the nucleus, we could develop treatment options.”

This study is important as it provides confirmatory evidence nucleocytoplasmic transport may be disrupted in ALS cases, a pathway that has been previously implicated in ALS progression, but also offers novel evidence that protein products of C9orf72 play an important part in this disease pathway.

“Recently, there have been four important publications, all honing in on this specific pathway. We're getting closer to finding treatment options,” Dr. Robertson stated. “Ultimately, our goal is to find a treatment for patients who desperately need more options.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →