Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

A new Westlake-backed biotech takes aim at migraines

An emerging area of drug development got more crowded Wednesday, with the debut of a biotechnology startup trying to create new migraine prevention therapies. Vedana Therapeutics formed in response to an earlier class of migraine-thwarting medicines that first

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

An emerging area of drug development got more crowded Wednesday, with the debut of a biotechnology startup trying to create new migraine prevention therapies. Vedana Therapeutics formed in response to an earlier class of migraine-thwarting medicines that first hit the market toward the end of the last decade. These medicines inhibit specific proteins, “CGRPs,” that play a key role in migraines by transmitting pain signals, widening blood vessels and triggering inflammation in the tissues around the brain. While effective for many, a large portion of patients — more than half , by some estimates — don’t respond to, or stop taking, CGRP-blocking therapies. Vedana wants to fill this treatment gap with antibody drugs aimed at another nervous system protein, “PACAP,” which appears to drive migraines in a similar but distinct way from CGRPs. It’s not alone in that pursuit. The Danish company Lundbeck, through its $2 billion purchase of Alder BioPharmaceuticals in 2019, not only acquired what would soon become an approved CGRP treatment, but also an anti-PACAP drug that has succeeded in multiple mid-stage clinical trials . Tailing Lundbeck are two more developers: Mentari Therapeutics, which in May announced plans to go public through a reverse merger, and Slate Medicines , a newly formed biotech that’s raised $130 million from blue-chip venture capital firms like RA Capital Management, Forbion and Foresite Capital. Anurag Agarwal, Vedana’s CEO and co-founder, argues that his company’s biggest advantage is its leadership team. Co-founder and chief scientific officer Leon Garcia, for example, oversaw discovery and development of Alder’s migraine programs. Ernesto Aycardi, Vedana’s chief medical officer, managed the pivotal and post-marketing studies for Teva Pharmaceuticals’ CGRP product Ajovy. Teva took control of Ajovy by buying its then-developer, Labrys Biologics, in 2014 . Vedana has recruited two Labrys veterans — former CMO Marcelo Bigal and CEO Steven James — to join the startup’s board of directors and serve as an adviser, respectively. And helming the board is Rob Lenz, who served as head of global development at Amgen when the pharmaceutical giant was advancing its CGRP drug Aimovig. “The biggest differentiator is the people that we have,” Agarwal said. “These are the people that have done it before, both for CGRP and PACAP. They understand the biology. They are the people who’ve [gone] from discovering a drug to delivering it to the migraine patient.” Vedana’s backers know the pain space well, too. Westlake BioPartners, which co-led the company’s now-disclosed $46 million Series A funding round, gathered former Amgen neuroscientists in 2019 to create a biotech focused on new, non-opioid painkillers . The round’s other co-leader, Canaan Partners, was an early investor in Labrys and has put money into startups like Nocion Therapeutics , Semnur Pharmaceuticals and Spinifex, the latter of which Novartis bought for $200 million up front in 2015. Agarwal expects Vedana’s current funding will be enough to get the company’s two main programs into human trials, which are on track to start next year. Like Mentari's pipeline, one of the programs goes after PACAP alone, while the other is a two-pronged antibody targeting that protein as well as CGRP. Such an approach may “deliver additional efficacy for patients who do not achieve relief with monotherapies,” Vedana said in a statement. Vedana “represents the deepest concentration of migraine expertise we have seen,” Julie Grant, a general partner at Canaan, added in that statement. “Importantly, they bring together the lived experiences from multiple migraine companies and medicines in large and small biotech. They are focused entirely on what the next generation of medicines needs to deliver for patients.” Vedana’s name comes from a Sanskrit word for feeling or sensation. Those feelings can be both painful and relieving, which, to Agarwal, “really [represented] what a migraine is.” EDITOR’S NOTE: The story has been updated to clarify James’ association with the company.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →