Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

A ‘DNA damage repair’ drugmaker raises $115M for cancer treatments

Artios Pharma has banked $115 million in a Series D round that will fund mid-stage studies for a pair of experimental cancer treatments. The company said Monday that the cash helps it expand enrollment in trials of its drug alnodesertib , which is in testing i

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Artios Pharma has banked $115 million in a Series D round that will fund mid-stage studies for a pair of experimental cancer treatments. The company said Monday that the cash helps it expand enrollment in trials of its drug alnodesertib , which is in testing in combination with chemotherapy for pancreatic and colorectal cancer, and start a new Phase 2 test of another experimental medicine, ART6043, in BRCA-mutant HER2-negative breast cancer. Artios is working on drugs that treat cancer by blocking proteins that repair damaged DNA in a cell. That approach was successfully used to develop a now widely used class of medicines called PARP inhibitors. Artios has been looking for the “next generation” of pathways that might be similarly impactful, said CEO Mike Andriole. That search led Artios to alnodesertib. The drug blocks a different target called ATR , or “ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein.” Like PARP enzymes, ATR helps fix DNA damage, so blocking it with a drug is seen as one way to kill tumor cells. Andriole noted how PARP inhibitors have proven particularly helpful for patients with so-called BRCA mutations. In the same vein, ATR blockers appear more beneficial for people with so-called ATM-negative tumors, which have compromised DNA repair systems. ATM-negative pancreatic and colorectal tumors are “two areas of very high unmet need,” said Andriole.

Cancer biotech veteran Mike Andriole is the CEO of Artios Pharma. Permission granted by Artios Pharma

Several other companies, among them AstraZeneca , Merck KGaA and Repare Therapeutics , have been developing ATR inhibitors, though none have yet been approved. Merck KGaA also stopped work on an earlier ATR blocker and pivoted to a newer prospect that’s now in mid-stage testing . Artios’ second program ART6043 goes after polymerase theta, another pathway involved in a cell’s DNA repair process. Andriole notes how most people on PARP inhibitors progress because of the development of a type of drug resistance that restores a tumor’s ability to fix itself. Adding a polymerase theta blocker on top of it might prevent that from occurring, leading to better and more durable responses, he said. “Of course, the only way to prove that is in a randomized study,” Andriole said. The company will start that kind of trial — which will test whether a combination of ART6043 and a PARP blocker is superior to a PARP drug alone — next year. The company is also conducting preclinical research on an antibody-drug conjugate that impacts a DNA damage repair mechanism, and plans to name a lead candidate from that work in 2026 as well. SV Health Investors and RA Capital Management co-led the financing, which included more than a dozen other venture firms, among them Sofinnova Partners, Novartis Venture Fund and EQT Life Sciences. Prior to Monday’s announcement, Artios had raised more than $320 million in funding. The Series D round enables Artios’ to operate well into 2027, when it expects to have data from both of its top programs, Andriole said. “The right decision for now was to continue to stay private and advance these two programs with this financing,” Andriole said. “We'll explore what comes next when we've got data in hand.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →